Moroni 7:5-7 – Validity of Priesthood Ordinances – LeGrand Baker

5 For I remember the word of God which saith by their works ye shall know them; for if their works be good, then they are good also.
6 For behold, God hath said a man being evil cannot do that which is good; for if he offereth a gift, or prayeth unto God, except he shall do it with real intent it profiteth him nothing.
7 For behold, it is not counted unto him for righteousness (Moroni 7:5-7) .

As was true with the first verses of this sermon, so it is here: there are different ways that we may read what Mormon said, and that difference is our perception of his audience. When discussing the first verses, I drew a distinction between an audience of high school seminary students, and the priesthood body to whom Mormon was speaking. That distinction is still important.

In these verses the differences in interpretation hangs on the definition of “works.” In the world of the teenager, works can mean taking warm bread to a neighbor or keeping the commandments as the Church teaches; being part of church activities, accepting church assignments, and just being nice to other people.

To teenagers, Mormon’s warning is easily translated into Church teachings. From the time we are little we are taught what God’s commandments are and that we should not only live those commandments but that we should also avoid being in the company of people who do not.

Mormon gives a stern reminder that evil men can produce attractive enticements, either by their actions or in the products they sell, and that those enticements can do real physical or spiritual harm. The Church reenforces those teachings by spelling out what many of those dangerous enticements are. Mormon’s words are a clear warning, insisting that we must not only look to the actions of an individual, but we must also examine his motives. If he hides his motives behind protestations of his own goodness, then we must look to the consequences of his actions, and their effects on others.

That is a helpful and perfectly legitimate way to understand this scripture.

However, if we read it as an address to a mature priesthood audience, then the interpretation is different, but no less scarey. Again, the understanding hangs on the meaning of “works.”

Probably the best place to begin looking for a priesthood definition of “works” is in Alma’s review of the Nephite temple drama. He says, “God conversed with men, and made known unto them the plan of redemption, which had been prepared from the foundation of the world; and this he made known unto them according to their faith and repentance and their holy works.(Alma 12:30).” In this context “faith” must surely be pistis–the covenants. And “holy works” are the ordinances that instruct the participant and validate his covenants. “Repentance” validates both. {1}

There are other scriptures where “works” clearly refer to the ordinances. One of the most straightforward is in Alma’s Zarahemla conference address. Before we read it, a quick review: Righteousness is zedek — the same as zedek in Melchizedek, which means “King of Righteousness” or “My king is righteous.” Right or righteous is a perfect translation. Zedek means correctness in priesthood and temple things. To be done in zedek (righteousness), ordinances must be performed in the right place, at an appropriate time, with the right authority, dressed the right way, using the right words, and with the right hand or arm gestures. If all of these things are not in place, the ordinance is not valid. Baptism, for example. They go down into the water, dressed the right way, he holds his arm the right way, he speaks the right words with the right authority and he dunks the other person, then brings him up out of the water. If any of those things are lacking, or if anything is added, the ordinance is not valid. The word zedek/righteousness represents the correctness of that baptismal ordinance.

At Zarahemla, Alma invited the people to be baptized, and in preparation for that invitation he quoted God as saying,

35 Yea, come unto me and bring forth works of righteousness [zedek], and ye shall not be hewn down and cast into the fire—
36 For behold, the time is at hand that whosoever bringeth forth not good fruit, or whosoever doeth not the works of righteousness, the same have cause to wail and mourn (Alma 5:35-36).

In this context, “works of righteousness” is clearly a reference to correct priesthood ordinances.

In a similar context Ammon rejoices with his brethren because of their success with the Lamanites. Here he uses almost the same wording that Alma used in his review of the Nephite temple drama (Alma 12 quoted above). First, another quick review: “Mystery” in the New Testament means “the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites”{2} It is a reference to the New Testament Christian temple rites. If, as I believe, the Book of Mormon and New Testament meanings are the same, then Ammon’s promise, “unto such it is given to know the mysteries of God,” is a reference to the Nephite temple rites. The difference between what Alma said and what Ammon said is that where Alma says “holy works,” Ammon says “good works.”

22 Yea, he that repenteth and exerciseth faith [pistis, keeping the covenants], and bringeth forth good works [ordinances], and prayeth continually without ceasing—unto such it is given to know the mysteries of God [Nephite temple drama]; yea, unto such it shall be given to reveal things which never have been revealed; yea, and it shall be given unto such to bring thousands of souls to repentance, even as it has been given unto us to bring these our brethren to repentance (Alma 26:22).

Alma used the same sequence, “faith and good works,” (pistis = covenants, and ordinances) when he described premortal priesthood callings.

3 And this is the manner after which they were ordained—being called and prepared from the foundation of the world according to the foreknowledge of God, on account of their exceeding faith and good works; in the first place being left to choose good or evil; therefore they having chosen good, and exercising exceedingly great faith, are called with a holy calling, yea, with that holy calling which was prepared with, and according to, a preparatory redemption for such (Alma 13:3).

The ultimate importance of correct priesthood ordinances is emphasized by the sequence culminating in the final judgement.

The Book of Mormon repeatedly tells us that the final judgement comes AFTER the resurrection. In other words, when we stand before the Savior to be judged, we will already have received our resurrected body. Celestial persons will already have been judged to merit a celestial glory. So the question might be asked, “Then why do they need a “final judgement?” The answer is zedek — all things must not only be correct, but legally correct — we must be judged by our works according to the validity of the ordinances we have received and honored.

As I understand it, the judgement that could enable one to receive a celestial body was based on keeping his covenants. For example, the object of the perfection to which we strive is defined in the Book of Mormon as charity, just as that object in the Doctrine and Covenants is keeping the law of consecration. They are two sides of the same coin. When charity is what we are, the law of consecration is what we do.

Those characteristics (the ones that are discussed at length by Mormon in his sermon in Moroni 7) are the criteria used to determine whether we will receive a celestial body in the resurrection. The Lord explained that more succinctly to the Prophet Joseph.

28 They who are of a celestial spirit shall receive the same body which was a natural body; even ye shall receive your bodies, and your glory shall be that glory by which your bodies are quickened.
29 Ye who are [present tense] quickened by a portion of the celestial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness.
30 And they who are quickened by a portion of the terrestrial glory shall then receive of the same, even a fulness [etc.] (D&C 88:28-30).

Alma says that after we have received our resurrected bodies we will be judged “according to our works.” Here are two examples:

21 But whether it be at his resurrection or after, I do not say; but this much I say, that there is a space between death and the resurrection of the body, and a state of the soul in happiness or in misery until the time which is appointed of God that the dead shall come forth, and be reunited, both soul and body, and be brought to stand before God, and be judged according to their works (Alma 40:21).

23 But God ceaseth not to be God, and mercy claimeth the penitent, and mercy cometh because of the atonement; and the atonement bringeth to pass the resurrection of the dead; and the resurrection of the dead bringeth back men into the presence of God; and thus they are restored into his presence, to be judged according to their works, according to the law and justice (Alma 42:23).

Alma says we “are restored into his presence, to be judged according to their works, according to the law and justice.

The Lord explained to the Prophet Joseph why that final judgement must be “according to the law and justice.” D&C 132 says that not only must things done correctly, but that they must also be “sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise.” That sealing is the final and necessary validation. Then he adds:

8 Behold, mine house is a house of order, saith the Lord God, and not a house of confusion.
9 Will I accept of an offering, saith the Lord, that is not made in my name?
10 Or will I receive at your hands that which I have not appointed?
11 And will I appoint unto you, saith the Lord, except it be by law, even as I and my Father ordained unto you, before the world was?
12 I am the Lord thy God; and I give unto you this commandment—that no man shall come unto the Father but by me or by my word, which is my law, saith the Lord.
13 And everything that is in the world, whether it be ordained of men, by thrones, or principalities, or powers, or things of name, whatsoever they may be, that are not by me or by my word, saith the Lord, shall be thrown down, and shall not remain after men are dead, neither in nor after the resurrection, saith the Lord your God.
14 For whatsoever things remain are by me; and whatsoever things are not by me shall be shaken and destroyed (D&C 132:8-14).

The final judgement is when one stands before the Savior to be judged by him. If that judgement is an ordinance (Perhaps something like the Israelite king going through the Great veil in Solomon’s temple, as is described in Psalm 21), then it is reasonable to suppose that, like every other ordinance, it will have to be done according to set rules — in zedek, following a precise, even legalistic formula. If that is so, then it is also reasonable to suppose that one would be expected to give evidence that he had received ALL of the necessary ordinances. I suppose that is what the Savior meant when he told the Prophet Joseph, “my house is a house of order.”

This brings us full circle back to the three verses in Moroni 7 where we started. The question of the validity of priesthood ordinances was a major issue in Mormon’s day. There were false churches that were performing counterfeit ordinances. He tells us,

27 And it came to pass that when two hundred and ten years had passed away there were many churches in the land; yea, there were many churches which professed to know the Christ, and yet they did deny the more parts of his gospel, insomuch that they did receive all manner of wickedness, and did administer that which was sacred unto him to whom it had been forbidden because of unworthiness.
28 And this church did multiply exceedingly because of iniquity, and because of the power of Satan who did get hold upon their hearts. (4 Nephi 1:27-28)

Understanding that Mormon was speaking to his “beloved brethren” who were surrounded by murderous apostates, corrupt doctrines, and fraudulent ordinances, one can hear the ring of urgency in Mormon’s words:

5 For I remember the word of God which saith by their works [the validity of their priesthood ordinances] ye shall know them; for if their works be good, then they are good also.
6 For behold, God hath said a man being evil cannot do that which is good; for if he offereth a gift, or prayeth unto God, except he shall do it with real intent it profiteth him nothing.
7 For behold, it is not counted unto him for righteousness (Moroni 7:5-7) .
————————-

FOOTNOTES

{1} See the chapter called “Alma 12, Review of the Feast of Tabernacles Drama” in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition, 651-55, paperback edition, 556-58.

{2} That definition is in Strong, 1894 edition, # 3466. For a more complete discussion of the meaning of “mystery” in the New Testament and in the Book of Mormon see footnote # 737 on page 463 of the paperback edition of Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, and also the chapter called “Sode Experience—Returning to the Council in Heaven,” pages 139-47. In the first edition, the footnote is # 726 on page 650 and the chapter is on pages 195-207.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Moroni | Comments Off on Moroni 7:5-7 – Validity of Priesthood Ordinances – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 7:2-4 – Peaceable followers of Christ become the sons of God – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 7:2-4 
2 And now I, Mormon, speak unto you, my beloved brethren; and it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.
3 Wherefore, I would speak unto you that are of the church, that are the peaceable followers of Christ, and that have obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven.
4 And now my brethren, I judge these things of you because of your peaceable walk with the children of men.

Mormon begins this sermon by addressing his “beloved brethren” and declaring the authority by which he is “permitted to speak.”

2 And now I, Mormon, speak unto you, my beloved brethren; and it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.

Mormon is the prophet and president of the church. If he needed permission to give this sermon, the only persons from whom he could have received that permission were, as he said, “it is by the grace of God the Father, and our Lord Jesus Christ, and his holy will, because of the gift of his calling unto me, that I am permitted to speak unto you at this time.”

This asks a very important question: what is there about this speech that the prophet had to get permission to deliver it. The answer, I think, is in the combination of the content of the speech and the audience to whom he addressed it.

The speech is brilliant. On one level it is most appealing to persons who have read the Book of Mormon for the first time. Seminary students and new converts love it because it speaks to their souls. And as we grow in the gospel it continues to speak to us. However, it takes a great reach on my part to begin to understand what it would have meant to the audience to whom it was first given.

The sermon begins by acknowledging his audience as those who “are the peaceable followers of Christ.”

3 Wherefore, I would speak unto you that are of the church, that are the peaceable followers of Christ, and that have obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven.

That brings us to some of the Savior’s most fundamental teachings. Many of the Beatitudes are quotes or paraphrases from the Psalms or from Isaiah. They move in a sequence from the first principles, through the temple rites and priesthood responsibilities until we come to verse 8 which says Zion shall see God, and then verse 9 which reads:

9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God (3 Nephi 12:9).

The group to whom Mormon addressed his sermon were remarkable because of their “peaceable walk with the children of men.” But they were more than that. It is a simple truth that to understand any quote, part of that understanding must be to know why and to whom it was spoken. Part of the context of any sermon is to know who the audience was. In this case it is a priesthood meeting. We know that because he addresses only “my beloved brethren,” and he did it nine times in these few pages.

Whether he intended to or not (and I believe it was very intentional), his sermon followed the pattern of, and was a perfect commentary on the Beatitude: “blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.” Because I believe he intended to do that, I also believe that a meaningful context into which to fit that sermon is the sequence of the Beatitudes. Here, I give only their barest outline. I realize that it contains no justifications for the conclusions it draws, however, these apparent leaps of logic are carefully discussed and documented in detail in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, {1}

Outline of the Beatitudes in the Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi 12:

v. 1 – Jesus gave authority to Twelve –

v. 1b – Follow the Brethren
v. 2 – First Principles – “visited by the Holy Ghost”
v. 3 – Poor in Spirit – endowment for the living – may become kings and priests
v. 4 – Comfort all that mourn – endowment for the dead (Isaiah 61)
v. 5 – Meek – the meek are those who keep their eternal covenants (Psalm 25)
v. 6 – “hunger and thirst after righteousness” – “filled with the Holy Ghost”
v. 7 – Merciful – how to be a king and a priest (Psalm 18:25)

v. 8 – Pure in Heart – Zion shall see God (D&C 97:16-21, 101:16-18)
v. 9 – Peacemakers – called [new name] “children of God” (Moroni 73-4 & 48)

v. 10 – “for my name’s sake” – do become kings and priests
v. 11-12 – “when men shall revile” – endure to the end
v. 13 – “salt of the earth” – missionary work
v. 14-16 – “light of this people” – to be a blessing to the Saints

It takes only a quick look at that sequence to realize that everything one needs to know and do in a whole lifetime is in those verses.

If Moroni 7 is a commentary on verse 9, then its placement in the sequence of the Beatitudes tells us a great deal about its meaning and significance. Then verse 8 may be seen as not only a prelude or introduction to verse 9 but also to Mormon’s sermon. Verse 8 reads simply, “And blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”

Psalm 24 promises the pure in heart will be welcomed into the temple to “receive the blessing from the Lord.”

3 Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord? or who shall stand in his holy place?
4 He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.
5 He shall receive the blessing from the Lord, and righteousness from the God of his salvation (Psalms 24:3-5).

Similarly, speaking of Zion, the Lord told the Prophet Joseph, “and all the pure in heart that shall come into it shall see God,” then he declared, “for this is Zion—THE PURE IN HEART” (D&C 97:16, 21).

The Beatitude that reads, “And blessed are all the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” is a perfect introduction to Moroni 7.

Mormon began his sermon by addressing his audience in those same terms. He spoke to those who “have obtained [past tense] a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord, from this time henceforth until ye shall rest with him in heaven. [then he added] … I judge these things of you because of your peaceable walk with the children of men.”

If I have understood Mormon’s introduction correctly, and the members of his audience really had “obtained a sufficient hope by which ye can enter into the rest of the Lord,” then they were not only in a very wonderful, but also in a very dangerous situation. Mormon understood that first hand. In his generation, many of the once faithful Nephites had not only denied the Savior, but had done so with violent furor. However, Mormon’s sermon also testifies to us that even in that environment there were some people who remained faithful, and that their prophet was concerned for their well-being. His message to them was that they must do more than try to avoid evil, but that must also keep their covenants, live as though those covenants were already fulfilled, and love each other and their God. Love—charity—was their ultimate defense against both evil and apostasy, just as it is ours.

The reason this sermon is so dearly beloved by Latter-day Saints in every stage of our spiritual development is because the Spirit testifies to each of us that the love that we give and that we accept from the Savior and from others (hesed) is the ultimate power that brings us back to the Savior and to our Heavenly Father. In this world, as Mormon observed, the fruit of love is peace, and the blessing to those who exude peace is that they may give peace to others—that they are peacemakers. Peace is a product of reciprocated love—hesed. {2}

The Beatitudes do not end with verse 9, but continue until they reach a new height—the “salt of the earth” is sharing the gospel; “light of this people” –is to be a blessing to the Saints—to be a personification of charity. Similarly, Peter’s sequence showing the attributes one must have in order to “make your calling and election sure” concludes with charity, (2 Peter 1:10) as does Mormon’s teachings in Moroni 7. I am convinced that while the priesthood ordinance and covenants are absolutely necessary to secure salvation, the ultimate sealing power (the power that validates the ordinances) is our own ability to give and to receive love.

Our Beatitude promises the peacemakers “shall be called [receive the new covenant-name] the children of God.” Mormon concludes his sermon with the same promise except he is speaking to only men, whereas the Savior was speaking to entire families.

48 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. Amen (Moroni 7:48).

————————-

FOOTNOTES

{1} Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, pages 646-96 in the edition in this website; and also check the “scriptures” section. The two are not exactly the same. The latter was written after the book was published and so contains a few ideas not in the former. That is especially true with verse 7.

{2} Hesed means “unfailing love based on a prior covenant.” Use the search engine to find more detailed discussions.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Moroni | Comments Off on Moroni 7:2-4 – Peaceable followers of Christ become the sons of God – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 6:1-9 – policies and practices of the Nephite church – LeGrand Baker

Mormon tells us almost nothing about the organization of the early Nephite church, and very little about how the church operated after the Savior came. Moroni does not tell us much more. Here he gives us only the barest of details. And even these tell us only about the policies and practices regarding the members of the church.

The first thing he tells us appears to be about their practice of rebaptisms:

1 And now I speak concerning baptism. Behold, elders, priests, and teachers were baptized; and they were not baptized save they brought forth fruit meet that they were worthy of it.
2 Neither did they receive any unto baptism save they came forth with a broken heart and a contrite spirit, and witnessed unto the church that they truly repented of all their sins.
3 And none were received unto baptism save they took upon them the name of Christ, having a determination to serve him to the end (Moroni 6:1-3).

His statement about who was baptized is most interesting. Apparently he does not mention a person’s initial baptism, but rather reports, “elders, priests, and teachers were baptized.” Since he gives no explanation, we are left to only guess about what the policies were. My guess is that there was a formal re-commitment that was validated by a rebaptism whenever someone received an advancement in the priesthood. Rebaptisms seem to have been relatively common among the Nephites, {1} and they were also frequently performed in the early LDS church. {2}

The reason baptism can be used to represent so many different milestones in our lives is that it can represent so many endings and new beginnings: Cleansing, remission of sins, burial and resurrection, born again, birth and death, entrance into the church, renewal of oneself (Romans 6:1-13; Mosiah 18:8-14; D&C 20:23-28; D&C 128:12-13; Moses 6:58-61).

The rest of what Moroni tells us about the practices in the Nephite church is almost exactly like our own. The members were given the gift of the Holy Ghost and then looked after by other church members. Moroni describes what could easily be read as home teaching and Relief Society visiting teaching.

4 And after they had been received unto baptism, and were wrought upon and cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost, they were numbered among the people of the church of Christ; and their names were taken, that they might be remembered and nourished by the good word of God, to keep them in the right way, to keep them continually watchful unto prayer, relying alone upon the merits of Christ, who was the author and the finisher of their faith.

Doctrine and Covenants 20 places the same requirements on Latter-day Saints. For example, the duties of the Elders are:

41 And to confirm those who are baptized into the church, by the laying on of hands for the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost, according to the scriptures;
42 And to teach, expound, exhort, baptize, and watch over the church;
46 The priest’s duty is to preach, teach, expound, exhort, and baptize, and administer the sacrament, ….
47 And visit the house of each member, and exhort them to pray vocally and in secret and attend to all family duties…..
51 And visit the house of each member, exhorting them to pray vocally and in secret and attend to all family duties. ….
53 The teacher’s duty is to watch over the church always, and be with and strengthen them;
54 And see that there is no iniquity in the church, neither hardness with each other, neither lying, backbiting, nor evil speaking;
55 And see that the church meet together often, and also see that all the members do their duty (D&C 20:41-55).

Their meetings were also similar to our own. Verse 5 could easily be a description of our own fast and testimony meetings:

5 And the church did meet together oft, to fast and to pray, and to speak one with another concerning the welfare of their souls.

They, like us, met often to partake of the sacrament:

6 And they did meet together oft to partake of bread and wine, in remembrance of the Lord Jesus.

For them, as for us, membership in the church was a privilege, not a right. The privilege was earned by obedience to the laws, covenants, and commandments of the gospel. Persons who were not willing to keep the commandments were excommunicated, but, just as in the present church, if they repented they were welcomed back into full fellowship.

7 And they were strict to observe that there should be no iniquity among them; and whoso was found to commit iniquity, and three witnesses of the church did condemn them before the elders, and if they repented not, and confessed not, their names were blotted out, and they were not numbered among the people of Christ.
8 But as oft as they repented and sought forgiveness, with real intent, they were forgiven.

To Latter-day Saints who are accustomed to well structured meetings that are conducted the same way all over the world, Moroni’s description of their meetings might sound a bit chaotic, but that need not have been so. Moroni tells us:

9 And their meetings were conducted by the church after the manner of the workings of the Spirit, and by the power of the Holy Ghost; for as the power of the Holy Ghost led them whether to preach, or to exhort, or to pray, or to supplicate, or to sing, even so it was done.

The form of our meetings are now set by church policy. However, the content of our meeting is still “conducted by the church after the manner of the workings of the Spirit.”We expect that the person presiding will receive inspiration about who should speak about what, and who should pray. The speakers’ message, the selection of hymn, and the prayers are all expected to be under the inspiration of the th Holy Ghost. The Lord told the Prophet Joseph,

2 But notwithstanding those things which are written, it always has been given to the elders of my church from the beginning, and ever shall be, to conduct all meetings as they are directed and guided by the Holy Spirit (D&C 62:2).

The Church is, and has always been, a social and cultural organization whose ordinances and covenants are unchanging, but whose other policies and practices are consistent with the culture of its people. Everything that is not pure doctrine is, and has been subject to change. For example, in the Victorian Age long dresses were necessary because it was considered immoral for women to let their ankles show. Because it was equally immoral among Church members the women who crossed the plains did so in great, long skirts. Now, when culture has changed so that skirts are shorter and women can wear pants in the workplace, it is not immoral for Church members to wear short skirts and pants. Even the presentation of the temple drama has evolved along with American cultural tastes.

Even though some definitions of right and wrong, and some policies and practices may be adapted to the culture of the people, others may not. Priesthood authority is eternal, and the ordinances and covenants remain constant because they relate to, and help define our present and eternal relationships with our Heavenly Father and the Savior.

The reason to have a church organization is another of those constants. No matter what the time, place, or culture, the purposes of the church are to administer the sacred ordinances and covenants, and to bless the members and to give them opportunity to bless others, and to provide a social and sub-cultural bulwark to sustain the righteous. Those were the reasons for the Nephite church, the New Testament church, and for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
—————–

FOOTNOTES

{1} I have written two short essays about that. You can find them using the search engine. They are: “Alma 7:14-16 – the many uses of re-baptism” and “Mosiah 18:9-30, The covenants of Baptism.”

{2}The Encyclopedia of Mormonism explains:

Rebaptism is rare among Latter-day Saints in modern times. Historically, however, many members were rebaptized as an act of rededication. This was first practiced in Nauvoo and was continued in the Utah Territory. Rebaptism served as a ritual of recommitment but was not viewed as essential to salvation. Members often sought rebaptism when called to assist in colonization or to participate in one of the united orders. On some occasions, the Saints were rebaptized as they prepared for marriage or entrance into the temple. Early members also rebaptized some of the sick among them as an act of healing. Because of misuse by some Church members, all such practices of rebaptism were discontinued in 1897. (“Rebaptism” in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 1-4 vols., edited by Daniel H. Ludlow [New York: Macmillan, 1992], 1194.)

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 

 

Posted in Moroni | Comments Off on Moroni 6:1-9 – policies and practices of the Nephite church – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 6:4 – cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 6:4 
4 And after they had been received unto baptism, and were wrought upon and cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost, they were numbered among the people of the church of Christ;

The words “cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost,” are unique to this passage of scripture. Nevertheless, they are very helpful in understanding how we are blessed by the Holy Ghost. There are four scriptures that teach we must be “sanctified by the Holy Ghost” The message of each of these scriptures is the same, but because the contexts are different, they combine to teach us a great deal.

The first is Paul’s statement about his own missionary purpose:

16 That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost (Romans 15:16).

The second is Alma’s description of the faithful who lived in Zarahemla:

54 Yea, will ye persist in supposing that ye are better one than another; yea, will ye persist in the persecution of your brethren, who humble themselves and do walk after the holy order of God, wherewith they have been brought into this church, having been sanctified by the Holy Spirit, and they do bring forth works which are meet for repentance (Alma 5:54).

The third is Alma’s description of the faithful who “were called after this holy order” of the priesthood:

11 Therefore they were called after this holy order, and were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb.
12 Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God.
13 And now, my brethren, I would that ye should humble yourselves before God, and bring forth fruit meet for repentance, that ye may also enter into that rest (Alma 13:11-13).

The fourth is part of the Savior’s injunction to the Twelve in 3 Nephi 27. He began that part of his instructions by saying:

13 Behold I have given unto you my gospel, and this is the gospel which I have given unto you—that I came into the world to do the will of my Father, because my Father sent me.

He then amplified the definition of the gospel by teaching about his Atonement. In connection with the gospel, he defined “the word” and then “the commandment,” then he concluded with: “this is my gospel; and ye know the things that ye must do in my church; for the works which ye have seen me do that shall ye also do; for that which ye have seen me do even that shall ye do (v.21)” So, between the two definitions of “gospel” are two instructions about being clean and sanctified:

18-19 And this is the word …. no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their faithfulness unto the end.
20 Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day (3 Nephi 27:13, 18-20).

We usually understand “sanctify” to mean to make sacred or holy, and we have difficulty attaching a concrete meaning to the idea that the Holy Ghost will make us holy. However, Moroni’s statement that they were “cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost” gives us the key to know what it means to be sanctified. My Strong says the Hebrew word (# 6942) translated as “sanctify” means “to make clean” or “to purify.” The Greek word (# 37) translated as “sanctify” means “to purify,” or to “make holy.” The notion that the Holy Ghost makes us clean explains what the other scriptures mean by “sanctify.”

Parley P. Pratt penned what is probably the most beautiful and comprehensive description of what it means to be cleansed by the Holy Ghost:

The gift of the Holy Spirit adapts itself to all these organs or attributes, It quickens all the intellectual faculties, increases, enlarges, expands and purifies all the natural passions and affections, and adapts them, by the gift of wisdom, to their lawful use. It inspires, develops, cultivates and matures all the fine toned sympathies, joys, tastes, kindred feelings and affections of our nature. It inspires virtue, kindness, goodness, tenderness, gentleness and charity. It develops beauty of person, form and features. It tends to health, vigor, animation and social feeling. It develops and invigorates all the faculties of the physical and intellectual man. It strengthens, invigorates and gives tone to the nerves. In short, it is, as it were, marrow to the bone, joy to the heart, light to the eyes, music to the ears, and life to the whole being.

In the presence of such persons one feels to enjoy the light of their countenances, as the genial rays of a sunbeam. Their very atmosphere diffuses a thrill, a warm glow of pure gladness and sympathy, to the heart and nerves of others who have kindred feelings, or sympathy of spirit. No matter if the parties are strangers, entirely unknown to each other in person or character; no matter if they have never spoken to each other, each will be apt to remark in his own mind, and perhaps exclaim, when referring to the interview, “O what an atmosphere encircles that stranger! How my heart thrilled with pure and holy feelings in his presence! What confidence and sympathy he inspired! His countenance and spirit gave me more assurance than a thousand written recommendations or introductory letters.” Such is the gift of the Holy Spirit, and such are its operations when received through the lawful channel, the divine, eternal Priesthood.{1}

I think I am safe in asserting that every person who has been baptized and received the Gift of the Holy Ghost has experienced to a greater or lesser degree the sense that he is clean from one or more sins that used to really bother him. After baptism we still have to work a long time to get to the state of “being made sacred,” because the cleansing is an ongoing process. Nevertheless, it is very real, and very comforting.

Baptism places our sins in remission, that is, it makes them inoperative in the way that cancer stops growing when it is “in remission.” Our sins remain in remission as we persist in making them a dormant and ineffectual part of our past. It is by the power of the Atonement and the workings of the Holy Ghost that those sins can cease altogether to be a part of our real Self. Then the sin no longer has claim upon our desires and we can live our lives as though it has no part in our eternal Self.

As in Alma 13 (which we read above in conjunction with the priesthood), the scriptures sometimes make no practical distinction between being cleansed by the Holy Ghost and by the Savior’s Atonement. The first part of that quote reads: they “were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb….[then] after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God ….” (Alma 13:11-13).

For us, the ultimate product of that cleansing is Peace — not a passive peace, but the power within us to transcend hurt, disappointment, and sorrow. In John 14, the name-titles that describes the sources of that kind of peace is translated “Comforter.” The key to the word’s meaning is in the Savior’s paraphrase of Isaiah’s prophecy about salvation for the dead.{2}

The word “comfort” in Isaiah 61:2 means the personal power to transcend sorrow. That power creates the ultimate “peace.” That verse in Isaiah 61 is paraphrased in the Beatitudes v. 4 as, “Blessed are all those who mourn for they shall be comforted.” The Greek word translated “comforted” in the New Testament Beatitudes (Strong # 3870) is a different form, but otherwise the same word as the word translated “Comforter” in John 14. (Strong 3875). So a reasonable way to understand “Comforter” would be “the ultimate source of the power to transcend sorrow” — the “Empowerer.” And “peace” is the fruit of that empowerment. {3}

As the Prophet Joseph explained, the Savior talked about two different Comforters in John 14. The Prophet said:

There are two Comforters spoken of. One is the Holy Ghost, the same as given on the day of Pentecost, and that all Saints receive after faith, repentance, and baptism. This first Comforter or Holy Ghost has no other effect than pure intelligence.
. …
Now what is this other Comforter? It is no more nor less than the Lord Jesus Christ Himself; {4}

The words of the Savior’s promise about that “other Comforter” in John are:

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you (John 14:15-27).

That “Other Comforter” is described more fully in Doctrine and Covenants 88:

3 Wherefore, I now send upon you another Comforter, even upon you my friends, that it may abide in your hearts, even the Holy Spirit of promise; which other Comforter is the same that I promised unto my disciples, as is recorded in the testimony of John.
4 This Comforter is the promise which I give unto you of eternal life, even the glory of the celestial kingdom;
5 Which glory is that of the church of the Firstborn, even of God, the holiest of all, through Jesus Christ his Son — (D&C 88:3-5).

As Joseph Smith said, John also describes the Holy Ghost as a Comforter:

26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. (John 14:15-27)

That last verse describes the “peace” which is both the purpose and power of each of the two Comforters. John also tells us about the time when the Savior bestowed the “peace” of that first Comforter upon the Apostles.

21 Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost (John 20:21-22).

There is a relationship between our being given the command to “receive the Holy Ghost,” being visited by the Holy Ghost, being filled with the Holy Ghost, being baptized with fire and the Holy Ghost, and the Holy Ghost as a Comforter. But I don’t know how to define each of those concepts in terms of each of the others.

Sometimes it is as important to know what we don’t know as it is to know what we do know. The reason is that when we are aware of the limits of our understanding, knowing those limits opens wonderful questions. We may not have the answers, but even being able to express the questions has value. So here are some of the things I don’t know.

As far as I can tell, being given the command to “receive the Holy Ghost,” and being “visited by the Holy Ghost” represent the same ideas. If that is so, it is probable that the other concepts (being filled by the Holy Ghost, being baptized with fire and the Holy Ghost, and the Holy Ghost as a Comforter) may represent a different set of ideas. Since I don’t know, I think I will just show you some key scriptures so you can decide what you think the relationships are.

Some of those phrases I mentioned are given context by the Savior’s Beatitudes in 3 Nephi.

1 … after that ye are baptized with water, behold, I will baptize you with fire and with the Holy Ghost….
2 … Yea, blessed are they who shall believe in your words, and come down into the depths of humility and be baptized, for they shall be visited with fire and with the Holy Ghost, and shall receive a remission of their sins.
….
6 And blessed are all they who do hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled with the Holy Ghost.
….
9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called [new name] the children of God (3 Nephi 12:1-9). {5}

The Doctrine and Covenants gives others a context by putting “baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost,” “the Comforter,” and “the peaceable things of the kingdom” all in a single sentence:

6 And this is my gospel—repentance and baptism by water, and then cometh the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost, even the Comforter, which showeth all things, and teacheth the peaceable things of the kingdom (D&C 39:5). {6}

Peter said that when the Savior was baptized he was also anointed “with the Holy Ghost and with power.” His words are:

37 That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached;
38 How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him (Acts 10:37-38).

I have wondered if the Savior’s being anointed by his Father “with the Holy Ghost and with power” may be something like the Savior’s promise to the Nephites: “after that ye are baptized with water, behold, I will baptize you with fire and with the Holy Ghost (3 Nephi 12:1).”

Some scriptures are especially helpful in understanding the meanings of those relationships. For example, Moroni’s last words are important, not only because they teach us how we can be cleansed and made holy by the Savior’s Atonement, but they also teach the relationship between ourselves, the Savior, and “the covenant of the Father.” However, in this passage he does not mention the Holy Ghost.

32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot (Moroni 10:32-33).

And finally there are the instructions given by God to Adam. They tie many of these principles into a very nice package. He establishes the relationships between baptism, the Spirit, justified, cleansed, sanctified, the Comforter, and “the peaceable things of immortal glory.”

58 Therefore I give unto you a commandment, to teach these things freely unto your children, saying:
59 That by reason of transgression cometh the fall, which fall bringeth death, and inasmuch as ye were born into the world by water, and blood, and the spirit, which I have made, and so became of dust a living soul, even so ye must be born again into the kingdom of heaven, of water, and of the Spirit, and be cleansed by blood, even the blood of mine Only Begotten; that ye might be sanctified from all sin, and enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory;
60 For by the water ye keep the commandment; by the Spirit ye are justified, and by the blood ye are sanctified;
61 Therefore it is given to abide in you; the record of heaven; the Comforter; the peaceable things of immortal glory; the truth of all things; that which quickeneth all things, which maketh alive all things; that which knoweth all things, and hath all power according to wisdom, mercy, truth, justice, and judgment.
62 And now, behold, I say unto you: This is the plan of salvation unto all men, through the blood of mine Only Begotten, who shall come in the meridian of time (Moses 6:58-62).

Even though I don’t understand HOW it works, I do know THAT it works. Through the power of the Atonement we can be made clean by the workings Holy Ghost. The ultimate promise is found at the end of verse 59: “that ye might … enjoy the words of eternal life in this world, and eternal life in the world to come, even immortal glory.”

————————
FOOTNOTES

{1} Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology (Liverpool, F. D. Richards, 1855), 98-99.

{2} See Isaiah 61 under in the Scriptures section of this website.

{3} Also in Isaiah 61:2 and the Beatitudes 3 Nephi 12:4, and Matthew 5:4. For a discussion of the meaning of “comfort” see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition pages 467-71; paperback edition (that one found in this website), pages 340-42.

{4} Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, selected and arranged by Joseph Fielding Smith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1976), 149-50.

{5} You can find a discussion of these Beatitudes in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (check table of contents) and in the scripture section of this website (search by chapter and verse)

{6} Lecture 5 in the Lectures on Faith has some useful information about relationships.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Moroni | Comments Off on Moroni 6:4 – cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost – LeGrand Baker

Moroni 4 & 5 – The Covenants of the Sacrament — LeGrand Baker

Our covenants are validated by the ordinances and the ordinances are validated by our keeping the covenants. The sacrament is a renewal and affirmation of both.

Even though the words of the two sacrament blessings are similar, their intent is quite different. The blessing on the bread is a three part covenant. The blessing on the water is an affirmation that we are keeping those covenants.

“Witness” can mean to make a covenant or to take an oath, and the context of the two prayers suggests the word is intended to mean different things in the different prayers.  “That” is a powerful conjunction that creates a dependent sequence of ideas.
————————

The blessing on the bread reads:

O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this bread to the souls of all those who partake of it; that they may eat in remembrance of the body of thy Son,
And witness [to covenant] unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father,
.     [1] that they are willing to take upon them the name of thy Son,
.     [2]  and [ that they are willing to] always remember him
.     [3]  and [ that they are willing to] keep his commandments which he has given them;
that they may always have his Spirit to be with them. Amen

————————

The blessing on the water reads:

O God, the Eternal Father, we ask thee, in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ, to bless and sanctify this wine to the souls of all those who drink of it, that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them;
.       that they may witness [to take an oath] unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father,
.        that they DO always remember him,
that they may have his Spirit to be with them. Amen.

————————–

In 3 Nephi 18 the resurrected Savior administers the sacrament to the Nephites, and in conjunction with that he also instituted a formal covenant with them. There are two correspond scriptures in the Book of Mormon that discuss this. One is Mosiah 5 where King Benjamin officiates as the people make a similar covenant. The other is Moroni 4 and 5 where the sacrament prayers are given verbatim. The covenants made by the people of King Benjamin and the ones in 3 Nephi are incorporated as an integral part of those prayers.

The Lord’s instructions to the Nephites includes the terms and objectives of the covenant. He said:

7 And this shall ye do in remembrance of my body, which I have shown unto you. And it shall be a testimony unto the Father that ye do always remember me. And if ye do always remember me ye shall have my Spirit to be with you.
8 And it came to pass that when he said these words, he commanded his disciples that they should take of the wine of the cup and drink of it, and that they should also give unto the multitude that they might drink of it.
9 And it came to pass that they did so, and did drink of it and were filled; and they gave unto the multitude, and they did drink, and they were filled.
10 And when the disciples had done this, Jesus said unto them: Blessed are ye for this thing which ye have done, for this is fulfilling my commandments, and this doth witness unto the Father that ye are willing to do that which I have commanded you.
11 And this shall ye always do to those who repent and are baptized in my name; and ye shall do it in remembrance of my blood, which I have shed for you, that ye may witness unto the Father that ye do always remember me. And if ye do always remember me ye shall have my Spirit to be with you (3 Nephi 18:7-11).

In Mosiah 5 the people spoke in unison and said:

5 And we are willing to enter into a covenant with our God to do his will, and to be obedient to his commandments in all things that he shall command us, all the remainder of our days, that we may not bring upon ourselves a never-ending torment, as has been spoken by the angel, that we may not drink out of the cup of the wrath of God.

To which the king responded:

6 And now, these are the words which king Benjamin desired of them; and therefore he said unto them: Ye have spoken the words that I desired; and the covenant which ye have made is a righteous covenant.
7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.
8 And under this head ye are made free, and there is no other head whereby ye can be made free. There is no other name given whereby salvation cometh; therefore, I would that ye should take upon you the name of Christ, all you that have entered into the covenant with God that ye should be obedient unto the end of your lives.
9 And it shall come to pass that whosoever doeth this shall be found at the right hand of God, for he shall know the name by which he is called; for he shall be called by the name of Christ.
10 And now it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall not take upon him the name of Christ must be called by some other name; therefore, he findeth himself on the left hand of God.
11 And I would that ye should remember also, that this is the name that I said I should give unto you that never should be blotted out, except it be through transgression; therefore, take heed that ye do not transgress, that the name be not blotted out of your hearts.
12 I say unto you, I would that ye should remember to retain the name written always in your hearts, that ye are not found on the left hand of God, but that ye hear and know the voice by which ye shall be called, and also, the name by which he shall call you (Mosiah 5:5-12).

As King Benjamin explains, to take upon oneself the name of Christ is to “become his sons and his daughters.” When we are adopted into a new family we take the family name as our own. But the terms of the adoption covenant mean more than that. An adopted child has the full rights of inheritance. So to take upon us the name of Christ is to lay claim to all the blessings implied by the family relationship.

The blessing on the bread is a reiteration of that covenant. Like all covenants it has two parts: the promises of the first party and the promises of the second.

For our part, we—

“witness unto thee, O God, the Eternal Father, that they are willing [that is the operative word] to take upon them the name of thy Son, and [that they are willing to] always remember him, and [that they are willing to] keep his commandments which he hath given them,”

For God’s part, his promise is

“that they may always have his Spirit to be with them (Moroni 4:3).

The blessing on the water is different from that. It is an assertion and an evidence that we are actually keeping the covenants we just made:

that they may do it in remembrance of the blood of thy Son, which was shed for them; that they may witness … that they do [“do” is the operative word here] always remember him,

Through that assertion we lay claim to the fulfillment of the Father’s part of the covenant:

“that they may have his Spirit to be with them” (Moroni 5:2).

Notwithstanding the fact that we take the sacrament weekly, and that many, especially the children, do not understand what the words say, there is noting trivial suggested in its frequent repetition. When the words of the covenants in the blessing on the bread are understood to represent a renewing of all of the covenants we have made, including the temple covenants; and the words of the blessing on the water asserts that we are keeping all of those covenants, then we begin to understand power represented in those ordinances.

It is little wonder the Savior warned:

28 And now behold, this is the commandment which I give unto you, that ye shall not suffer any one knowingly to partake of my flesh and blood unworthily, when ye shall minister it;
29 For whoso eateth and drinketh my flesh and blood unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to his soul….(3 Nephi 18:28-29).

 <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Moroni | Comments Off on Moroni 4 & 5 – The Covenants of the Sacrament — LeGrand Baker

Ether 12:27 – weakness, strength, and humility & pistis, hesed, and charity – LeGrand Baker

Please note: In this discussion of the veil ceremony of the ancient Israelite temple drama, the conclusions I express here are only my opinions . That will become increasingly obvious as I make straightforward assertions in this little essay, and then leave it to you and the footnotes to examine the evidence for those assertions.

——————–

In the scriptures, there are five different but equally important discussions of the ancient Israelite temple drama veil ceremony. They are:

1. Psalm 21 which was sung by the congregation as the king approached the veil of Solomon’s temple. The words of the psalm begin by describing the ceremony, then conclude with Jehovah’s promise of invulnerability spoken from behind the veil. {1}

2. The second is Nephi 9:41-42, where Jacob warns the children of Lehi of the consequence of not keeping their covenants.{2}

3. Ether chapters 3 and 4 is one of the most explicit and beautiful examples in the scriptures. We discussed that a few weeks ago.

4. Ether 12:27-41 (our subject today) is a splendid explanation of why it is necessary.

5. Job is a detailed, but deeply encoded description.{3} ——————–

Ether 12:27 27 And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them.

When taken by itself, verse 27 is one of the most frequently quoted passages in the Book of Mormon. This is because it is one of the most encouraging to us ordinary mortals who sometimes struggle with a sense of our inability to change or to cope.

However, when taken as a part of its sub-textual contest, it is sublimely beautiful. The verse is part of a conversation between Moroni and the Savior. At the beginning of that conversation Moroni expresses his concern about his weakness in writing.

26 And when I had said this, the Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools mock, but they shall mourn; and my grace is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness;

That verse is the key to understanding the rest of their conversation. The key words are “my grace is sufficient for the meek” If you believe as I do that words in the Book of Mormon have a consistent meaning, and that the meanings are the same as in the King James Bible, then pay careful attention to the Savior’s use of “grace” and “meek” to identify those who acknowledge their “weakness” and who “humble themselves before me.”

First, we must ask, “What is grace, and who are the meek?” Both words describe those who make and keep covenants. Here is a very quick discussion of their meanings.

GRACE

The Greek word is charis. It is an expression of kindness. {4} It is graciousness — “the divine influence on the heart.” {5} In the New Testament it is always the love that God gives to man.

Its nearest Hebrew equivalent is hesed. {6}

HESED

Hesed is “unfailing love, loyal love, devotion. kindness, often based on a prior relationship, especially a covenant relationship.” {7} It is “the closest of human bonds.” {8}

Unlike “grace” in the New Testament, hesed in the Old Testament is a reciprocal love that God gives to man and that man gives to God, or that people give to each other. The word hesed is usually used to describe the relationships between God and men, or between man and man, but it is not limited to that. In the devotion of Ruth and Naomi the word hesed is not found, but Ruth’s covenant is one of the most endearing passages in the Old Testament (Ruth 1:16-18). In that same story hesed is translated as “kindness” when Boaz accepts Ruth to be his wife (Ruth 3:10).

In the psalms hesed is often the covenant of love between God and the king. During the Feast of Tabernacles temple drama the king was the main actor, but whatever ordinances or covenants happens with the king symbolically also happens with each man in the congregation. For example, Psalm 25 is spoken by the king in this world, but the references are to his personal premortal covenants. Hesed is used four times in that short psalm. The first is translated as “lovingkindnesses.” The other three are translated as mercy. Psalm 25 is my favorite because it makes the covenants we made at the Council in Heaven an important part of the experiences we have in this life. We have discussed that at length in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord. {9}

PISTIS

In verse 27, Moroni writes, “for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them.” We will discus that verse below, but here it needs to be pointed out that the sense of eternal covenant in the words “grace” and hesed is also shared by the word “faith.” The Greek word translated faith is pistis. Its nearest modern English equivalent is contract or covenant. The New Testament and the Book of Mormon consistently use “faith” to represent covenants we made/make with God. {10}

The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament ties a nice bow around the covenant meanings of “grace,” hesed, and pistis.

Stress is often laid on the fact that this [pistis] is a higher endowment than wealth. … Concretely pistis means the ‘guarantee’ which creates the possibility of trust, that which may be relied on, or the assurance of reliability, ‘assurance’. … pistis is the ‘oath of fidelity,’ ‘the pledge of faithfulness,’ ‘security.’ This leads on the one side to the sense of ‘certainty,’ ‘trustworthiness,’ on the other to that of ‘means of proof,’ ‘proof.’ In particular pistis denotes the reliability of persons, ‘faithfulness.’ It belongs especially to friendship. {11}

Primarily, then, pistis is an attitude of man to himself, not to others. As man’s faithfulness to himself, however, pistis makes possible the right relation to others, He who is “faithful to himself” can also be “faithful” to others; he alone is capable of genuine friendship. {12}

The conclusion is that “grace,” hesed, and pistis are all about covenants that sustain and validate friendship. It gets better!

PHILADELPHIA

Non-LDS scholars are at a great disadvantage when they try to define “the hesed of God.” Some insist it is an expression of God’s love, while others say that it is only about the legality of the covenants he made with Moses. {13} The scholars struggle with trying to make hesed mean the covenants God made with Israel, and the reciprocal covenants we make with each other. The reasons for these diverse opinions is that in their system of thought, God is mystical undefinable, and people have no premortal existence. Therefore, the scholars cannot understand that there were premortal friendship-covenants-relationships. However, for Book of Mormon prophets, God’s love is eternal and the covenants are an expression of his love. The most important covenant was between the Father and the Savior, and with us. The Savior’s Atonement is the token, validation, and fulfillment of that covenant (Moroni 10:32-33).

When you and I read the definition of hesed as “unfailing love based on a prior covenant,” our minds find no conflict in finding two sources for the love and the covenants.

The first is our premortal covenants and the second is the covenants we make in this world.

The premortal covenants were reciprocal both between each other and between us and God. The friendships and sacred covenants we make in this world are probably affirmations of the ones we made before.

The idea that charis in the New Testament is the same as hesed in the Old Testament works well when discussing the covenants God makes with us. However, it does not work so well with the covenants friends make with each other. An example of hesed as brotherly love that many scholars like to use is the love that initiated the covenants between David and Jonathan.{14}

Hesed works fine as a description of such mutual friendships and covenants in the Old Testament, but the word philadelphia is probably a better New Testament Greek representation of brotherly love.

The Greek word philadelphia means what the city’s moto says it means: brotherly love, or “fraternal affection.” {15}

That opens up a slightly different but equally fruitful line of inquiry.

Even though the hesed relationship described in the psalms is often between the king who speaks the words, and Jehovah to whom he addresses them, it must be remembered that in the ancient Israelite temple drama the king represented every man in the congregation. Therefore, the hesed relationship described there also evokes the terms of the covenant between Jehovah and each worthy man. That being so, it follows that this same hesed relationship also exists as an eternal bond between each of God’s children and Jehovah, perhaps between the people and their prophet/king, and most certainly among each other. Consideration of the this-worldly continuation of those premortal hesed relationships brings us to Peter’s assurance that “brotherly kindness” (philadelphia) is prerequisite to making one’s calling and election sure (2 Peter 1:1-11). {16}

The first four verses of 2 Peter uses the word pistis (faith) to mean the entire ancient Christian temple service, concluding with: “Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature.” (2 Peter 1:4)

Then Peter lists in sequence eight things we must do in order to make our “calling and election sure.” (2 Peter 1:1-10)

The first four are qualities which have to do with only our Selves:

1 The first is faithpistis, covenants we make and keep.

2 Then virtue – the literal meaning is “manliness,” strong, brave, intelligent, with integrity.

3 Then knowledge –I understand that in light of this statement: “Truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come” (D&C 93:24)

4 Then temperance – self control, not doing anything in excess.

The second four are about our relationships with other people:

5 Patience – we must be patient, not only with other people, but also with ourselves and God (as is expressed in Psalm 25).

6 Godliness – The LDS Bible footnote says “reverence.” It means accepting others for the beauty that is in them. We cannot be hurtful to anything or anyone we revere.

7 Brotherly kindness – The Greek word is philadelphia – one-on-one fraternal love.

8 Charity – Love for everyone.

8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.

9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.

10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:

11 For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ (2 Peter 1:1-8).

The sequence is necessary. One cannot have charity (love for everyone) if one does not first have philadelphia (one-on-one love between individuals). In this sequence Peter has taken our triumvirate of pistis, hesed, and charity, and shown us how those attitudes must first be focused on individuals before they can become universal.

Mormon, in Moroni 7, gives us a similar sequence, only with a different emphasis . He said that in order to “become the sons of God” we must have faith (pistis), hope, and charity. Hope is “living the covenants as though they were already fulfilled.” {17} Mormon asks,

41 And what is it that ye shall hope for? Behold I say unto you that ye shall have hope through the atonement of Christ and the power of his resurrection, to be raised unto life eternal, and this because of your faith in him according to the promise (Moroni 7:41).

In Peter’s sequence fraternal love is the prerequisite to charity. In Mormon’s sequence the prerequisite is hope. It is an easy logical step to equate “fraternal love” and “living as though the covenants [with God and man] were already fulfilled.” We cannot hope for eternal life if philadelphia is not a part of the fundamental definition of who and what we are. Then both the hope and the philadelphia bring us to charity.

The Prophet Joseph seems to have reached that same conclusion when he wrote: “Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism.” {18}

As we consider these principles it becomes obvious that none of the relationships discussed here are limited to, or even focused on this life’s fleeting experiences. Rather, we are glimpsing the true nature of our eternal covenants with God and with each other. The infinite quality of those friendships is evinced in the Doctrine and Covenants where the Lord explains:

45 Verily, I say unto my servant Joseph Smith, Jun., or in other words, I will call you friends, for you are my friends, and ye shall have an inheritance with me— 46 I called you servants for the world’s sake, and ye are their servants for my sake (D&C 93:45-46).

MEEK

Those who are meek are clearly defined in Psalm 25and therefore in the Beatitudes as those who keep the covenants they made in the Council in Heaven (sode). We have discussed that at some length in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord. {19}

That brings us full circle back to the Savior’s assurance to Moroni that “my grace is sufficient for the meek.” Now that we have established the definitions of “grace” and “meek,” and their connotations of eternal covenants and eternal friendships, we can continue with an analysis of verse 27 as an explanation of the significance of the ancient Israelite temple drama veil ceremony.

The reason we had to define grace and meek before we could analyze verse 27 is that the “men” at the beginning of verse 27 are the meek who accept that grace in the preceding sentence. Read as a single idea, the verses say:

26-28 … my grace [love, hesed] is sufficient for the meek [who keep their eternal covenants], that they shall take no advantage of your weakness; And if men [the meek whom the Lord has just identified] come unto me [This may be a reference to either the temple veil or to the shechinah that separates us from God.] I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them [the covenant of invulnerability]. Behold, I will show unto the Gentiles their weakness, and I will show unto them that faith, hope and charity bringeth unto me—the fountain of all righteousness.

WEAKNESS

“Weakness” is singular in each of the five times it is used here (“weak things” is different). This suggests that there is only one weakness that men will overcome in this context of the ancient temple drama. The Lord explains what he means by “weakness” to Moroni a little later in their conversation.

37 And it came to pass that the Lord said unto me: If they have not charity it mattereth not unto thee, thou hast been faithful; wherefore, thy garments shall be made clean. And because thou hast seen thy weakness thou shalt be made strong, even unto the sitting down in the place which I have prepared in the mansions of my Father.

In this verse, to be made strong is to be in the presence of God. And to recognize one’s weakness is to see the contrast between being away from him and being where he is. The whole purpose of the Nephite temple drama was to teach them how to achieve that end.

HUMBLE

Moroni now teaches us, by the Savior’s example, what it means to be humble.

38 And now I, Moroni, bid farewell unto the Gentiles, yea, and also unto my brethren whom I love, until we shall meet before the judgment-seat of Christ, where all men shall know that my garments are not spotted with your blood. 39 And then shall ye know that I have seen Jesus, and that he hath talked with me face to face, and that he told me in plain humility, even as a man telleth another in mine own language, concerning these things;

Now, if we are to understand “humble” in verse 27 we must define it in such a way that the definition also fits with the Savior’s “plain humility” in verse 39.

In the conversation as Moroni described it, we can hardly imagine the Savior’s humility as being self-deprecating as he explains the ramifications of his Atonement. Rather, what Moroni has presented to us is a conversation between to unassuming friends — without masks, or facades, or pretenses — just themselves as they really are.

Jacob described the masks some men wear before God when he taught the Nephites about how they must come to veil of the newly constructed Nephite temple. He said,

42 And whoso knocketh, to him will he open; and the wise, and the learned, and they that are rich, who are puffed up because of their learning, and their wisdom, and their riches—yea, they are they whom he despiseth; and save they shall cast these things away, and consider themselves fools before God, and come down in the depths of humility, he will not open unto them (2 Nephi 9:41-42).

Moroni concludes his account of his conversation with the Savior with this prayer:

41 And now, I would commend you to seek this Jesus of whom the prophets and apostles have written, that the grace [covenant friendship] of God the Father, and also the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost, which beareth record of them, may be and abide in you forever. Amen.

It is apparent to me that each of the code words discussed here can be fully understood only in light of all the others. So all of the concepts in these words must be part of the definition of the whole. In other words, each of these words is a different facet of our relationship to Heavenly Father with whom we made the covenant, and to the Savior whose Atonement is the terms, the hope, and the fulfillment of that eternal covenant.{20}

The central force that holds all of these ideas together is the singular intimacy of true friendship sustained by the triumvirate of pistis, hesed, and charity – unbounded mutual love validated by covenant.

26 And when I had said this, the Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools mock, but they shall mourn; and my grace is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness; 27 And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them. 28 Behold, I will show unto the Gentiles their weakness, and I will show unto them that faith, hope and charity bringeth unto me —the fountain of all righteousness. ————————

FOOTNOTES

{1} For a discussion of Psalm 21 see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapters, “The King at the Veil of Solomon’s Temple,” and “The Veil Ceremony in Psalm 21″ First edition, pages, 527-557; paperback edition (the one that is available on this website) pages 390-400.

{2} For two short essays, use the search engine in this website. Search “2 Nephi 9:41.”

{3} For a brief discussion of job, see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapter, “The Symbolism of the Book of Job.” First edition, pages, 155-57; paperback edition, pages 116-118.

{4} “Tthe state of kindness or favor toward someone.” Strong # 5485. Kohlenberger, John R. III and James A. Swanson. The Strongest Strong’s, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.

{5} Strong # 5485. James Strong, ed. The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. (New York, Eaton & Mains, [first edition], 1890.

{6} “Indeed, if this fuller meaning [of grace] is to be represented at all by a Hebrew word, it is the word … (hesed)…. This word is, however, usually translated in the LXX by the Greek word … (‘mercy’).” Article on “grace” in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (Nashville, Abingdon Press, 1991), 2: 464.

{7} John R. Kohlenberger III and James A. Swanson, The Strongest Strong’s, Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001), Hebrew dictionary # 2617.

Katherine Doob Sakenfeld of Princeton University Seminary wrote a dissertation on “hesed” in which she argued that it meant “to do what is expected of one.” With regard to the covenant, God does what is expected (keep his covenant promises); man should also maintain “hesed” (keep his covenant promises). Katherine Doob Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible: A New Inquiry (Missoula, Montana; Scholars Press for the Harvard Semitic Museum, 1978).

{8} “We may venture the conjecture that even in cases where the context does not suggest such mutuality it is nevertheless implicit, because we are dealing with the closest of human bonds.”

G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren, eds., trans. Davod E. Green, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, 15 vols. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1986), article about hesed, 5:45-48).

{9} For a discussion of Psalm 25 see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapters, “Meaning of ‘Meek’ in Psalm 25: Keeping One’s Eternal Covenants” and “The Meek in Psalm 25.” First edition, pages, 525-43; paperback edition, pages 378-90. However, for a discussion of the psalm, the paperback edition is better and it is available on this website.

{10} See “Ether 12:4-30 & Hebrews 11:1-27 – ‘faith’ as covenant – LeGrand Baker” in this website.

{11} Friedrich, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 6: 177. In the text pistis is written in Greek letters. In these quote pistis is written in italics. In the last sentence emphasis is added.

{12} Friedrich, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, 6:182.

{13}In addition to Strong, I am using the following sources in my discussion of the meaning of Hesed:

Katherine Doob Sakenfeld, The Meaning of Hesed in the Hebrew Bible: A New Inquiry (Missoula, Montana: Scholars Press for the Harvard Semitic Museum, 1978).

R. Laird Harris, ed., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago, Moody Press, 1980), 1: 305-7.

G. Johannes Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren, eds., Translated by David E. Green, Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament (1986 Grand Rapids, Michigan, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1986), 5:44-64.

{14} 1 Samuel 20:8, 14, 15; 2 Samuel 1:26; 2 Samuel 9:1, 3, 7.

{15} (Strong: Greek 5360 [first edition, 1894] reads: “philadelphia; fraternal affection: brotherly love (kindness), love of the brethren.” [Emphasis is in original).

{16} In this verse, the King James Version uses the phrase “brotherly kindness,” but elsewhere in the New Testament that same Greek word is always translated as “brotherly love” which has a somewhat stronger connotation.

{17} For a discussion of hope in the context of “faith, hope, and charity” see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the following chapters, “Moroni 7: Faith, Hope, and Charity”; and “Meaning of ‘Faith’ — Pistis”; and “A Meaning of ‘Hope’”; “A Meaning of ‘Charity’.” First edition, pages, 1005 1043 ; paperback edition, pages 696-722.

{18} Joseph Smith, The Words of Joseph Smith: The Contemporary Accounts of the Nauvoo Discourses of the Prophet Joseph, compiled and edited by Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook (Provo: BYU Religious Studies Center, 1980), 234.

{19} For a discussion of the context of “meek” in Psalm 25 see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapters, “Meaning of ‘Meek’ in Psalm 25: Keeping One’s Eternal Covenants” and “The Meek in Psalm 25.” First edition, pages, 525-43; paperback edition, pages 378-90. However, for a discussion of the psalm, the paperback edition is better and it is available on this website.

{20} Moroni 10:32-33 teaches us the relationship between the Father’s covenant and the power of the Savior’s Atonement.

32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God. 33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot.

 <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 12:27 – weakness, strength, and humility & pistis, hesed, and charity – LeGrand Baker