Ether 12:22-26 – the power of words – LeGrand Baker

22 And it is by faith [pistis = covenants] that my fathers have obtained the promise that these things should come unto their brethren through the Gentiles; therefore the Lord hath commanded me, yea, even Jesus Christ (Ether 12:22).

What follows is a remarkable, and very enlightening conversation between the Savior and Moroni.

23 And I said unto him: Lord, the Gentiles will mock at these things, because of our weakness in writing; for Lord thou hast made us mighty in word by faith, but thou hast not made us mighty in writing; for thou hast made all this people that they could speak much, because of the Holy Ghost which thou hast given them;

The problem Moroni expresses was confronted by all of the prophets before him. When two or three people speak of sacred things, they don’t have to “spell out” what they mean to each other. Sometimes half sentences and incomplete explanations work nicely. When one speaks of those things to a larger audience, a few carefully selected code words will suffice for the speaker and some, perhaps many in the audience to communicate. (The Brethren’s Conference talks are a good example.) However, when one writes, no matter how carefully he chooses his words, he must depend entirely on his readers to make the right connections.

I suppose it is for that reason that the Book of Mormon is written in two separate languages — and they are both English. There is a surface text that anyone who is literate can read. It is wonderful, as I and millions of other people can attest. The second language is in code, and the ancient temple is the code. If one knows the Nephite temple, one knows the code, otherwise the encoded text is simply not there. An example is between the dashes in 2 Nephi 1:10.

10 But behold, when the time cometh that they shall dwindle in unbelief, after they have received so great blessings from the hand of the Lord—having a knowledge of the creation of the earth, and all men, knowing the great and marvelous works of the Lord from the creation of the world; having power given them to do all things by faith; having all the commandments from the beginning, and having been brought by his infinite goodness into this precious land of promise—behold, I say, if the day shall come that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah, their Redeemer and their God, behold, the judgments of him that is just shall rest upon them (2 Nephi 1:10).

Moroni gives another reason why it is difficult for him to write the ideas he wishes to convey.

24 And thou hast made us that we could write but little, because of the awkwardness of our hands.

Part of the difficulty was their method of writing sacred texts on metal plates. Joseph’s description of the plates tells us a great deal about that. He wrote:

These records were engraven on plates which had the appearance of gold. Each plate was six inches wide and eight inches long and not quite so thick as common tin. They were filled with engravings in Egyptian characters and bound together in a volume, as the leaves of a book with three rings running through the whole. The volume was something near six inches in thickness, a part of which was sealed. The characters on the unsealed part were small, and beautifully engraved. The whole book exhibited many marks of antiquity in its construction and much skill in the art of engraving.{1}

From the text itself we learn that the writing on the brass plates was also engraved, just as were Nephite records throughout their history. {2}

It is apparent that the writing on the plates was not simply scratched onto their surfaces, and that the fine art of engraving on the very thin gold plates had been passed down from generation to generation. That makes it very easy to understand why Moroni would bemoan “the awkwardness of our hands.”

24 And thou hast made us that we could write but little, because of the awkwardness of our hands. Behold, thou hast not made us mighty in writing like unto the brother of Jared, for thou madest him that the things which he wrote were mighty even as thou art, unto the overpowering of man to read them.

I suppose that there were two reasons the brother of Jared wrote with such power. One was that he wrote in the language that Adam, Enoch, and Noah spoke before human languages was confounded. Second, and this is only a subset of the first, he did not need to use any code words, but spelled it all out with exactness that could not be misunderstood. On one hand, such exactness would be mocked by anyone whose experiences had not already validated the meanings. On the other, such straightforwardness would condemn anyone who refused to understand.

Moroni did not have the luxury to do that because the surface text of the Book of Mormon is a magnificent missionary tool, and, therefore, must teach without giving offence.

25 Thou hast also made our words powerful and great, even that we cannot write them; wherefore, when we write we behold our weakness, and stumble because of the placing of our words; and I fear lest the Gentiles shall mock at our words.

The “placing of our words” can be a problem in any language. Let me give you a simple example. When I was a young man people said I was “good looking.” Now I am an old man people say I am “looking good.” Same words, opposite meanings !

It is apparent to me as I read the Book of Mormon, that prophets wrote with great precision and that the translation — accomplished “by the gift and power of God” — was equally precise. That leaves the burden of understanding entirely on intent of the reader.

26 And when I had said this, the Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools mock, but they shall mourn; and my grace is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness;

When the Savior spoke the Beatitudes, he quoted or paraphrased parts of Isaiah and the Psalms. One reads, “Blessed are all the meek for they shall inherit the earth.” The Savior is quoting Psalm 37, “But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace (Psalms 37:11). There it implied, and in D&C 88:17-18 clearly says, the meek will inherit the celestial earth. In Psalm 25 it says that the meek are those who keep the covenants they made at the Council in Heaven (“secret” = sode), and that their children will inherit the earth (eternal family).

The Lord assures Moroni that “my grace [probably hesed] is sufficient for the meek, that they shall take no advantage of your weakness.” {3}

In the next sentence, the Savior moves the subject from Moroni’s perceived weakness to the real weakness of those who are meek. The surface text on that sentence is one of the most quoted in the Book of Mormon. The subtext is one of the most sublime.
——————-
FOOTNOTES

{1} Joseph Smith, History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, ed. B.H. Roberts (Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1946): 4:537.

{2} A few examples that give us that information are 1 Nephi 3:3, 1 Nephi 9:3-4, 2 Nephi 5:32, 3 Nephi 5:10, and the testimonies of both the three and the eight witnesses.

{3} Search “Psalm 25” in this website to find the meaning of sode and hesed as they are used there.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 12:22-26 – the power of words – LeGrand Baker

Ether 12:4-30 & Hebrews 11:1-27 – ‘faith’ as covenant – LeGrand Baker

Mormon and Moroni organized the Book of Mormon after the pattern of the ancient Israelite temple drama. {1} The book ends with a dramatic crescendo whose theme of faith, hope, and charity is repeated three times, in Ether 12, Moroni 7, and Moroni 10.

Once again, an understanding of those scripture hangs on the meaning of “faith.” So once again, let me quickly say that in the New Testament “faith” is translated from the Greek word pistis {2} and that in the Book of Mormon, “faith” has the same meaning as it has in the New Testament.

In New Testament times, pistis was then a commercial or diplomatic term whose nearest modern English equivalent is contract or covenant. Using this definition, faith in the Savior is a covenantal relationship where the covenant is between Heavenly Father and us, his children, and the Savior is the personification of the terms, the validation, the hope, and the fulfillment of that covenant (Moroni 10:32-33).

About 75 or 100 A.D., as the apostasy came to dominate Christian thinking, the church lost the terms of the covenant, so “faith” came to mean something like: believing without evidence; or wishing really hard; or believing without that belief impacting one’s actions. {3}

Paul defined pistis with succinct precision when he wrote:

1. Now pistis is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen (Hebrews 11:1).

There are five parts of Paul’s definition of pistis. Three are stated. Two are implied because they are obviously so necessary that they are simply a given.

1. This is a given: To be a covenant or contract it must define the agreement and the way it will be accomplished.
2. “Substance” – There must be a mutually understood about what is the object of the covenant (I get you money, you give me the car).
3. “Evidence” – The act (a handshake, signature, etc) that validates the agreement and guarantees the fulfillment of the covenant.
4. “Hope” – Believing and acting as though the terms of the covenant were already fulfilled (the bank really owns the car but I treat it as though it were already mine).
5. Finally, another given in Paul’s definition – the fulfillment of the terms of the covenant.

Throughout chapter 11, each time we see the word “faith” Paul has used the word pistis, meaning covenant. Paul assures us that:

6 But without [the covenants] pistis it is impossible to please [God]: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him [that God keeps his part of the covenants] (Hebrews 11:6).

Paul cites about 20 examples where God and man work together through covenants. His first example is the creation, in which Jehovah and the members of the Council in Heaven participated together.

3 Through [covenants] pistis we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear (Hebrews 11:3).

Some of his other examples are:

11 Through [covenants] pistis also Sara herself received strength to conceive seed, and was delivered of a child when she was past age, because she judged him faithful who had promised (Hebrews 11:11).

17 By [covenants] pistis Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son (Hebrews 11:17).

22 By [covenants] pistis Joseph, when he died, made mention of the departing of the children of Israel; and gave commandment concerning his bones (Hebrews 11:22).

27 By [covenants] pistis he [Moses] forsook Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king: for he endured, as seeing him who is invisible (Hebrews 11:27).

The point is, God is not a vending machine that all we have to do is wish hard for an outcome, and cause God to respond to that nickle. Rather, in reality, all things are done by covenant, otherwise God would be capricious and our relationship with him would be entirely unpredictable.

In Ether 12, Moroni teaches us about our covenants the same way Paul did. He writes:

4 Wherefore, whoso believeth in God might with surety hope [living in anticipation of the fulfillment of the covenant] for a better world, yea, even a place at the right hand of God, which hope cometh of faith [our covenants], maketh an anchor to the souls of men, which would make them sure and steadfast, always abounding in good works, being led to glorify God.

We cannot know what Nephite word Moroni used that is translated as “faith,” but it is apparent that the word had the same meaning as pistis because he taught us by using the same principle that Paul used by giving us examples of how God and man work together through covenants. Moroni defines “faith” almost the same way that Paul does, beginning with the premise that the covenant is a means of obtaining an objective that is not yet accomplished.

6 And now, I, Moroni, would speak somewhat concerning these things; I would show unto the world that faith [pistis] is things which are hoped for and not seen; wherefore, dispute not because ye see not, for ye receive no witness until after the trial of your faith [pistis].

In one of his examples, Moroni uses “faith” two different way, and both are important.

30 For the brother of Jared said unto the mountain Zerin, Remove—and it was removed. And if he had not had faith [had fulfilled the terms of the covenant] it would not have moved; wherefore thou workest after men have faith [have received the covenant].

If there had not been a covenant already in place in which the Lord had promised the brother of Jared he would move the mountain, no matter how hard the brother of Jared had wished it, and no matter what words he had used, the mountain would not have moved. Conversely, had the brother of Jared not fulfilled his part of the covenant, and acted in righteousness [zedek] according to the terms of the covenant, the mountain would not have moved.

(In the following, I have replaced “faith” with “[covenant]” to help you think about the concept rather than the meaning of the word.)

7 For it was by [covenant] that Christ showed himself unto our fathers, after he had risen from the dead; and he showed not himself unto them until after they had [covenant] in him; wherefore, it must needs be that some had [covenant] in him, for he showed himself not unto the world.

8 But because of the [covenant] of men he has shown himself unto the world, and glorified the name of the Father, and prepared a way that thereby others might be partakers of the heavenly gift, that they might hope for those things which they have not seen.

9 Wherefore, ye may also have hope, and be partakers of the gift, if ye will but have [the covenant].

10 Behold it was by [covenant] that they of old were called after the holy order of God.

11 Wherefore, by [covenant] was the law of Moses given. But in the gift of his Son hath God prepared a more excellent way; and it is by [covenant] that it hath been fulfilled.

12 For if there be no [covenant] among the children of men God can do no miracle among them; wherefore, he showed not himself until after their [covenant].

13 Behold, it was the [covenant] of Alma and Amulek that caused the prison to tumble to the earth.

14 Behold, it was the [covenant] of Nephi and Lehi that wrought the change upon the Lamanites, that they were baptized with fire and with the Holy Ghost.

15 Behold, it was the [covenant] of Ammon and his brethren which wrought so great a miracle among the Lamanites.

16 Yea, and even all they who wrought miracles wrought them by [covenant], even those who were before Christ and also those who were after.

17 And it was by [a covenant] that the three disciples obtained a promise that they should not taste of death; and they obtained not the promise until after their [covenant].

18 And neither at any time hath any wrought miracles until after their [covenant]; wherefore they first believed in the Son of God.

19 And there were many whose [hope in the covenant] was so exceedingly strong, even before Christ came, who could not be kept from within the veil, but truly saw with their eyes the things which they had beheld with an eye of [covenant], and they were glad.

20 And behold, we have seen in this record that one of these was the brother of Jared; for so great was his [belief in the covenant] in God, that when God put forth his finger he could not hide it from the sight of the brother of Jared, because of his word which he had spoken unto him, which word he had obtained by [covenant].

21 And after the brother of Jared had beheld the finger of the Lord, because of the promise which the brother of Jared had obtained by [covenant], the Lord could not withhold anything from his sight; wherefore he showed him all things, for he could no longer be kept without the veil.

22 And it is by [covenant] that my fathers have obtained the promise that these things should come unto their brethren through the Gentiles; therefore the Lord hath commanded me, yea, even Jesus Christ.

If I have read these scriptures correctly, it is a certainty that in our relationship with God there is nothing coincidental or haphazard, but everything is based on first making, then keeping our covenants.
————————

FOOTNOTES

{1}For a review of that organization see Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the chapter called “Mormon’s Outline of the Book of Mormon (first edition, 655-70, paperback edition 472- 75). The paperback edition is available on this website under “published books.”

{2} I have discussed the meaning of faith many times. The most complete is in the chapters on faith hope and charity in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (first edition, 1005 – 1043, paperback edition 696- 722).

The Theological Dictionary of the New Testament devotes almost 50 pages to the original definition and the historical evolution of the meaning of pistis. Part of that definition reads:

Stress Is often laid on the fact that this pistis is a higher endowment than wealth….Concretely pistis means the “guarantee” which creates the possibility of trust, that which may be relied on, or the assurance of reliability… pistis is the “oath of fidelity,” “the pledge of faithfulness,” “security.” This leads on the one side to the sense of “certainty:’ “trustworthiness,”
On the other to that of “means of proof,” “proof,” In particular pistis denotes the reliability of persons. “faithfulness.” It belongs especially to friendship. (Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Edited by Gerhard Friedrich, translated and edited by Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan), 6: 177.)

{3} The highly respected Bible scholar, David Noel Freedman, explained faith this way:

Faith is a peculiarly Christian concept. While other religious traditions have aspects of what the churches have come to name “faith,” none has the specific quality of intellectual assent that distinguishes faith from fidelity. The problem of faith and the central discussion of it arises in the context of the medieval attempts to codify and integrate the Christian experience into the emerging philosophical language of the scholastics. (Article on “Faith” by David Noel Freedman, Anchor Bible Dictionary, [Doubleday, New York, 1992], vol. 2 p. 744-745.)

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Ether, Other New Testament Books | Comments Off on Ether 12:4-30 & Hebrews 11:1-27 – ‘faith’ as covenant – LeGrand Baker

Ether 3:6, 13-16 – ‘the body of my spirit’ – LeGrand Baker

Ether 3:6, 13-16

6 And it came to pass that when the brother of Jared had said these words, behold, the Lord stretched forth his hand and touched the stones one by one with his finger. And the veil was taken from off the eyes of the brother of Jared, and he saw the finger of the Lord; and it was as the finger of a man, like unto flesh and blood; and the brother of Jared fell down before the Lord, for he was struck with fear. …

13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.
14 Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.
15 And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast. Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image.
16 Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh (Ether 3:6, 13-16).

The story of the brother of Jared is wonderful, not only because it answers some very important questions, but also because it asks questions that are equally important. Sometimes questions are more stimulating than answers. That is because answers often invite us to stop wondering, but questions encourage us to think, and thus to expand the wonderment.

The very important answer we get from this account is that the Savior’s spirit body looked just like his physical body, and by extension, like his resurrected body also. That information is vital to us because it is the underlying premise upon which we build our entire concept of the premortal spirit world. The creation accounts say that we were created in the image of God, {1} but none are as explicit as what Jehovah said to the brother of Jared:

16 Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh.

With the clarity of that answer about what spirit bodies look like, comes other questions about one’s ultimate origin — about the origin of our individuality — our intelligence that gave the spirit body its personality, and its power to think and to make meaningful choices.

The most authoritative statement about the relationship of our intelligence with our premortal and mortal bodies was written by Elder B. H. Roberts in 1907. I used the word “authoritative” because when it was first published in the Improvement Era it included this editorial note:

Elder Roberts submitted the following paper to the First Presidency and a number of the Twelve Apostles, none of whom found anything objectionable in it, or contrary to the revealed word of God, and therefore favor its publication.—EDITORS. (Improvement Era, April, 1907)

The next year, Elder Roberts wrote the second in a series of priesthood lesson manuals for the Seventies quorums to use during their weekly meetings.{2} The first lesson of that manual was adapted from the Improvement Era article and included the same editorial note that said this was approved by “the First Presidency and a number of the Twelve Apostles.”

I am quoting it here because I believe the information it contains is necessary for one to understand the nature on one’s own eternal Self.

The Nature of Intelligencies: There is in that complex thing we call man, an intelligent entity, uncreated, self existent, indestructible, He—for that entity is a person; because, as we shall see, he is possessed of powers that go with personality only, hence that entity is “he,” not “it,”—he is eternal as God is; co-existent, in fact, with God; of the same kind of substance or essence with deity, though confessedly inferior in degree of intelligence and power to God. One must needs think that the name of this eternal entity—what God calls him—conveys to the mind some idea of his nature. He is called an “intelligence;” and this I believe is descriptive of him. That is, intelligence is the entity’s chief characteristic. If this be a true deduction, then the entity must be self-conscious, and “others—conscious,” that is, he must have the power to distinguish himself from other things—the “me” from the “not me.” He must have the power of deliberation, by which he sets over one thing against another; with power also to form a judgment that this or that is a better thing or state than this or that. Also there goes with this idea of intelligence a power of choosing one thing instead of another, one state rather than another. These powers are inseparably connected with any idea that may be formed of an intelligence. One cannot conceive of intelligence existing without these qualities any more than he can conceive of an object existing in space without dimensions. The phrase “the light of truth” [Doc. & Cov., Sec. xciii.] is given in one of the revelations as the equivalent for an “intelligence” here discussed; by which is meant to be understood, as I think, that intelligent entities perceive the truth, are conscious of the truth, they know that which is, hence “the light of truth,” “intelligence.” Let it be observed that I say nothing as to the mode of the existence of these intelligences, beyond the fact of their eternity. But of their form, or the manner of their subsistence nothing, so far as I know, has been revealed, and hence we are without means of knowing anything about the modes of their existence beyond the fact of it, and the essential qualities they possess, which already have been pointed out.

The intelligent entity inhabiting a spirit-body make up the spiritual personage. It is this spirit life we have so often thought about, and sang about. In this state of existence occurred the spirit’s “primeval childhood;” here spirits were “nurtured” near the side of the heavenly Father, in his “high and glorious place;” thence spirits were sent to earth to unite spirit-elements with earth-elements—in some way essential to a fulness of glory and happiness (Doc. & Cov. Sec. xciii: 32-35)—and to learn the lessons earth-life had to teach. The half awakened recollections of the human mind may be chiefly engaged with scenes, incidents and impressions of that spirit life; but that does not argue the non-existence of the uncreated intelligences who preceded the begotten spiritual personage as so plainly set forth in the revelations of God.

The difference, then, between “spirits” and “intelligencies,” as here used, is this: Spirits are uncreated intelligencies inhabiting spiritual bodies; while “intelligencies,” pure and simple, are intelligent entities, but unembodied in either spirit bodies or bodies of flesh and bone. They are uncreated, self-existent entities, possessed of “self-consciousness,” and “other-consciousness”— they are conscious of the “me” and the “not me”; they possess powers of discrimination, (without which the term “intelligence” would be a solecism) they discern between the evil and the good; between the “good” and “the better.” They possess “will” or “freedom,”— within certain limits at least— the power to determine upon a given course of conduct, as against any other course of conduct. This intelligence “can think his own thoughts, act wisely or foolishly, do right or wrong.” To accredit an “intelligence” with fewer or less important powers than these, would be to discredit him as an “intelligence” altogether. {3}

Later, Elder Roberts clarified further the characteristics of those intelligences that are called “noble and great” in Abraham 3:22. He wrote:

Do these higher intelligences of the stellar universe and planetary systems have so developed in themselves the quality of love that makes it possible to think of them as being willing to sacrifice themselves—to empty themselves in sacrifice to bring to pass the welfare of others whom they may esteem to be the undeveloped intelligences of the universe? And may they not be capable of giving the last full measure of sacrifice to bring to pass the higher development of the “lowly” when no other means of uplift can be serviceable? Is the great truth operative among these untold millions of intelligences that greater love hath no intelligence for another than this, that he would give his life in the service of kindred intelligences when no other means of helpfulness is possible? {4}

—————————–

FOOTNOTES

{1} Even the creation accounts vary in how they say it: Genesis 1:27; Genesis 1:27; Hebrews 1:1-3; Alma 22:12; Ether 3:15; D&C 20:18; Moses 2:27; Moses 6:8-9; Abraham 4:27.

{2} In those days each stake had a quorum of Seventies, and the Seventies in each ward met together as a group to have a lesson, just as each stake now has a quorum of High Priests who meet in their individual ward groups.

It is another testimony to me, that Joseph was a true prophet, that the organization he described in D&C 107 was for the Church in our time when the quorums of Seventy actually have the responsibilities the Prophet said they should have. Before the church was big enough to need Seventies who were General Authorities, it had local Seventies quorums in each stake. These Seventy had the responsibility to help with missionary work. For example, my father was ordained a Seventy when he left to go on his mission in 1930, and I was ordained a Seventy while I was in grad school when I was called to be a stake missionary. It took more than a hundred years after the Church was first organized before its worldwide population grew so large that it needed General Authorities who were permanently stationed in many places. When the Church grew large enough to have that need, all the local stake Seventies were ordained High Priests, and the General Authority Seventies were organized to become what the Prophet had envisioned they should be way back in 1835.

{3} B. H. Roberts, Seventy’s Course in Theology, Second Year [Salt Lake City: Deseret News, 1907-1912], part 1, lesson 1, p, 8-11.
These manuals were originally printed in five different volumes, but have since been reprinted . This reference is to a reprint.

{4} B. H. Roberts, The Truth, The Way, The Life, ed. John W. Welch (Provo, Utah: BYU Studies, 1994), 98.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 3:6, 13-16 – ‘the body of my spirit’ – LeGrand Baker

Ether 3:17-28 – The prophetic vision of Forever – LeGrand Baker

25 And when the Lord had said these words, he showed unto the brother of Jared all the inhabitants of the earth which had been, and also all that would be; and he withheld them not from his sight, even unto the ends of the earth (Ether 3:25).

Moroni is very careful to tell us just enough about the vision, but not too much. He writes:

7 And now, as I, Moroni, said I could not make a full account of these things which are written, therefore it sufficeth me to say that Jesus showed himself unto this man in the spirit, even after the manner and in the likeness of the same body even as he showed himself unto the Nephites.
18 And he ministered unto him even as he ministered unto the Nephites; and all this, that this man might know that he was God, because of the many great works which the Lord had showed unto him (Ether 3:17-18).

In Ether chapter 4, Moroni gives us a short history of what happened to the written account of that vision. He reports:

The Lord commended the brother of Jared to write the things which he had seen, but he was to show it to no one “until after Christ should show himself unto his people (v.1).”

When the Savior came to the Nephites, “he commanded that they [the writings] should be made manifest.” After that, during the peaceful time of 4 Nephi, they were apparently part of the Nephite scriptural canon (v.2).

When the Nephites apostatized again, Moroni was “commanded that I should hide them [the original plates on which they were written] up again in the earth (v.3).”

Moroni was also commanded to make a copy of them on the gold plates which would eventually come into the hands of the Prophet Joseph (v.4).

Having explained that, Moroni writes a personal letter to the Prophet Joseph (who will read it about 1,400 years later) explaining that he has sealed that part of the plates, along with the “interpreters” so that they can eventually be translated when people are worthy to read a full account of the vision.

6 For the Lord said unto me: They shall not go forth unto the Gentiles until the day that they shall repent of their iniquity, and become clean before the Lord (Ether 4:6).

1 And now I, Moroni, have written the words which were commanded me, according to my memory; and I have told you the things which I have sealed up; therefore touch them not in order that ye may translate; for that thing is forbidden you, except by and by it shall be wisdom in God (Ether 5:1.)

The rest of chapter 4 is the promise, spoken by the Savior, that when the saints are truly a Zion people, they will have that record again.

Moroni also tells us that the Lord had shown this same, or a similar vision to many prophets. He wrote:

19 And there were many whose faith was so exceedingly strong, even before Christ came, who could not be kept from within the veil, but truly saw with their eyes the things which they had beheld with an eye of faith, and they were glad.
20 And behold, we have seen in this record that one of these was the brother of Jared; for so great was his faith in God, that when God put forth his finger he could not hide it from the sight of the brother of Jared, because of his word which he had spoken unto him, which word he had obtained by faith (Ether 12:19-20).

“Which word he had obtained by faith.” Faith, here, clearly has the same meaning as faith in the New Testament. There, it is translated from the Greek word pistis. The nearest English equivalents are either contract or covenant. We learn about that covenant in a previous chapter where Moroni tells us:

26 For he [Jehovah] had said unto him [brother of Jared] in times before, that if he would believe in him that he could show unto him all things—it should be shown unto him; therefore the Lord could not withhold anything from him, for he knew that the Lord could show him all things (Ether 3:26).

Even though “many … whose faith was so exceedingly strong [they] could not be kept from within the veil,” there is relatively little in our scriptures about what they saw. In fact, the only full account we have is the highly encoded Revelation of John the Beloved.

Six hundred years before John’s time, Nephi wrote that would be John’s assignment:

27 And I, Nephi, heard and bear record, that the name of the apostle of the Lamb was John, according to the word of the angel (1 Nephi 14:27).

And 400 years after John wrote, the Savior confirmed John’s assignment to Moroni, and promised that the time would come when we would actually be able to understand John’s code.

16 And then shall my revelations which I have caused to be written by my servant John be unfolded in the eyes of all the people. Remember, when ye see these things, ye shall know that the time is at hand that they shall be made manifest in very deed (Ether 4:16).

Of the “many” who have seen this or a similar vision, we know of several. They are: Adam, Enoch, the brother of Jared, Abraham, Isaiah, Lehi, Nephi, John the Baptist, John the Beloved, Mormon, Moroni, and the Prophet Joseph Smith

All of these men have had the same thing in common. Each one had a far-reaching responsibility. In order to fulfill that assignment, each had to understand his place in the grand scheme of things. Therefore, each had to be shown who they were and what they had covenanted to do. The following is an example of some of their reports about what they saw and understood:
———————-

ADAM

Adam prophesied about “all the families of the earth,”

9 And in that day the Holy Ghost fell upon Adam, which beareth record of the Father and the Son, saying: I am the Only Begotten of the Father from the beginning, henceforth and forever, that as thou hast fallen thou mayest be redeemed, and all mankind, even as many as will.
10 And in that day Adam blessed God and was filled, and began to prophesy concerning all the families of the earth, saying: Blessed be the name of God, for because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God (Moses 5:9-10).
—————

ENOCH

Enoch’s vision is reported in Moses chapters 6 and 7 and in the apocryphal Book of Enoch and the Book of the Secrets of Enoch.

67 And the Lord showed Enoch all things, even unto the end of the world; and he saw the day of the righteous, the hour of their redemption, and received a fulness of joy (Moses 7:67).

1 And the Lord summoned me, and said to me: Enoch, sit down on my left with Gabriel.
2 And I bowed down to the Lord, and the Lord spoke to me: Enoch, beloved, all that you see, all things that are standing finished I tell to you even before the very beginning, all that I created from non-being, and visible things from invisible. {1}
—————

ABRAHAM

Abraham, like Enoch, saw not only the fulness of human history, but also his own place in the universe (Abraham ch. 3-5)

11 Thus I, Abraham, talked with the Lord, face to face, as one man talketh with another; and he told me of the works which his hands had made;
12 And he said unto me: My son, my son (and his hand was stretched out), behold I will show you all these. And he put his hand upon mine eyes, and I saw those things which his hands had made, which were many; and they multiplied before mine eyes, and I could not see the end thereof (Abraham 3:11-12).

22 Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones;
23 And God saw these souls that they were good, and he stood in the midst of them, and he said: These I will make my rulers; for he stood among those that were spirits, and he saw that they were good; and he said unto me: Abraham, thou art one of them; thou wast chosen before thou wast born (Abraham 3:22-23).

1 And then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth (Abraham 4:1).
—————

ISAIAH

Isaiah chapter 6 is the most complete example of a sode experience in the Old Testament. {2} He tells us he returned to the Council in Heaven and re-committed to fulfill the covenants he had made before the world was.

8 Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying: Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then I said: Here am I; send me.
9 And he said: Go and tell this people—Hear ye indeed, but they understood not; and see ye indeed, but they perceived not.
10 Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes—lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted and be healed.
11 Then said I: Lord, how long? And he said: Until the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man, and the land be utterly desolate;
12 And the Lord have removed men far away, for there shall be a great forsaking in the midst of the land (2 Nephi 16:8-12. The Book of Mormon version is better than the one in the Old Testament).

Much of what Isaiah saw about his contemporary world is in the first 35 chapters of the Book of Isaiah. Chapters 36-39 are about king Hezekiah. Some of that appears to be taken from the king’s own writings.

Chapters 40 through 66 are Isaiah’s poetic review of the ancient Israelite temple drama. This is apparent because he begins in the Council in Heaven, quotes many of the psalms, and concludes with the Savior’s millennial reign, just as the drama did. Or else, those chapters are a poetic rendition of the vision he saw of all of human history. I suppose it doesn’t matter which it is because they are both essentially the same story. (This is true except for Isaiah 44:28 through chapter 48. That part has all the fingerprints of an ancient forgery.{3}
—————

LEHI

Lehi’s sode experience is the most simple and also the most complete. In it, Lehi returns to the Council, sees its members (angels) who are singing; sees God who is presiding, sitting on his throne; receives an assignment from Jehovah, and reads a book in which he learns of the destruction and apparently the ultimate redemption of Jerusalem (1 Nephi 1:8-15).

Later, the information he learned there was augmented by his vision of the tree of life.
—————

NEPHI

When Nephi asked to see what his father saw, he was shown everything John the Beloved would later see and record (1 Nephi 14:27). That tells us that both Lehi and Nephi saw the entire vision.
—————

JOHN THE BAPTIST

John the Baptist’s testimony is found in the Gospel of John, but more fully in Doctrine and Covenants 93:1-18.

6 And John saw and bore record of the fulness of my glory, and the fulness of John’s record is hereafter to be revealed.
7 And he bore record, saying: I saw his glory, that he was in the beginning, before the world was….
10 The worlds were made by him; men were made by him; all things were made by him, and through him, and of him.
11 And I, John, bear record that I beheld his glory, as the glory of the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, even the Spirit of truth, which came and dwelt in the flesh, and dwelt among us….
16 And I, John, bear record that he received a fulness of the glory of the Father;
17 And he received all power, both in heaven and on earth, and the glory of the Father was with him, for he dwelt in him.
18 And it shall come to pass, that if you are faithful you shall receive the fulness of the record of John.
—————

JOHN THE BELOVED’S BOOK OF REVELATION

Several years ago, after I returned to BYU, I audited a New Testament class from my friend Professor C. Wilfred Griggs. The following outline of John’s Revelation is from my notes in that class:

Chapter 1 – Introduction – when, where, how the revelation was received {4}
Chapters 2-3 – Cover letters
Chapters 4-22 – The revelation
Chapters 4-11 – The theodicy – God’s justification – we will do it my way. This continues until the second coming
Chapters 12 -15 – Now we go back to the Council in Heaven and fight premortal war. It tells how evil came to be in heaven and how it was kicked down to earth
Chapters 16-20 – Continuation of war on earth (following chapter 11) and the defeat of evil
Chapters 21-22 – The new heaven and new earth
—————

MORMON and MORONI

Since Moroni is so thoroughly conversant with the Brother of Jared’s vision, and since both he and his father Mormon wrote the Book of Mormon to us, for our benefit in our time, because they had seen us and knew our needs, it seems reasonable to believe that both of those great prophets had seen the same, or a similar vision as the brother of Jared.
—————

JOSEPH SMITH

The Prophet Joseph’s testimony is found in what appears to be a poetic version of Doctrine and Covenants 76. However, Section 76 describes a single vision that he shared with Sidney Rigdon and always says “we saw.” The poem is different. It always says “I saw.” Besides being written in first person singular, it is also more explicit and contains insights that are not in Section 76. (I have wondered if it also includes some account of what he saw in his First Vision.)

A VISION
BY
THE PROPHET JOSEPH SMITH

I will go, I will go, to the home of the Saints,
. Where the virtue’s the value, and life the reward;
But before I return to my former estate,
. I must fulfil the mission I had from the Lord.

Wherefore, hear 0 ye heavens, and give ear 0 ye earth,
. And rejoice, ye inhabitants, truly again;
For the Lord he is God, and his life never ends,
. Aud besides him there ne’er was a Saviour of men.

His ways are a wonder, his wisdom is great;
. The extent of his doings there’s none can unveil;
His purposes fail not; from age unto age
. He still is the same, and his years never fail.

His throne is the heavens — his life-time is all
. Of eternity now, and eternity then;
His union is power, and none stays his hand,
. The Alpha, Omega, for ever. Amen.

For thus saith the Lord, in the spirit of truth,
. I am merciful, gracious, and good unto those
That fear me, and live for the life that’s to come:
. My delight is to honour the Saints with repose,

That serve me in righteousness true to the end;
. Eternal’s their glory and great their reward.
I’ll surely reveal all my myst’ries to them —
. The great hidden myst’ries in my kingdom stor’d;

From the council in Kolob, to time on the earth,
. And for ages to come unto them I will show
My pleasure and will, what the kingdom will do
. Eternity’s wonders they truly shall know. …..

And now after all of the proofs made of him,
. By witnesses truly, by whom he was known,
This is mine, last of all, that he lives; yea, he lives!
. And sits at the right hand of God on his throne.

And I heard a great voice bearing record from heav’n,
. He’s the Saviour and only begotten of God;
By him, of him, and through him, the worlds were all made,
. Even all that careen in the heavens so broad.

Whose inhabitants, too, from the first to the last,
. Are sav’d by the very same Saviour of ours;
And, of course, are begotten God’s daughters and sons
. By the very same truths and the very same powers. {5}

—————
FOOTNOTES

{1} Book of the Secrets of Enoch, in The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, 2 vols. Translated and edited by R. H. Charles. V.2: 431-69, [Oxford: Clarendon, 1976], ch. 24:1-2.)

{2}An interesting discussion of Isaiah’s sode experience is Christopher R. Seitz, “The Divine Council: Temporal Transition and New Prophecy in the Book of Isaiah, Journal of Biblical Literature, vol. 109, no. 2 (1990), p. 229-247.

{3} This forgery is apparent for two reasons: (1) It purports to break Gods “everlasting covenant” with the House of David and give the kingship of Judah to Cyrus, a non Israelite. (2) Isaiah 48 in the Old Testament and 1 Nephi 20, are significantly different. The former is about Cyrus, but the latter (which is the brass plates’ version) is about Joseph Smith’s part in the premortal councils. For an historical background on the forgery in this website, search “1 Nephi 20.” When you do that, you will also find the commentary of verses 12-17 and 18-21:1, but this search engine puts some out of order so you will have to scroll down a bit to find the commentary on verses 1-11.

{4} There are three colophons at the beginning of Revelation.
The first two are what Wilfred called the Introduction.
(1) John says he is on the Isle of Patmos, where he is instructed two write.
(2) The second he sees the Lord and is instructed to write his vision.
(3) The third colophon is a sure evidence that we are reading someone who really is who he claims to be, and is almost as deeply encoded as his account of the revelation. It is written as seven letters to seven churches. The colophon is in the encoded message. If one reads just the first half of each of the letters, one can follow the outline of the ancient Israelite temple drama. If one reads only the second half of each of the letters, one finds an explanation of the drama’s symbolism.

{5} It was published in the Times and Seasons, February 1, 1843, and republished in the Millennial Star, August, 1843. You can find the full poem on this website under “Favorite Quotes,” then go to “Smith, Joseph – D&C 76, poetic version.”

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>>

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 3:17-28 – The prophetic vision of Forever – LeGrand Baker

Ether 3:6-16 – The Conversation between the Lord and the brother of Jared – LeGrand Baker

The story of the brother of Jared is wonderful, not only because it answers some pivotal questions, but also because it asks others. Sometimes questions are more important than answers. Answers often satisfy us, and thereby invite us to stop wondering. But questions encourage us to think, and thus to expand the wonder. The story Moroni tells us is this:

6 And it came to pass that when the brother of Jared had said these words, behold, the Lord stretched forth his hand and touched the stones one by one with his finger. And the veil was taken from off the eyes of the brother of Jared, and he saw the finger of the Lord; and it was as the finger of a man, like unto flesh and blood; and the brother of Jared fell down before the Lord, for he was struck with fear.
7 And the Lord saw that the brother of Jared had fallen to the earth; and the Lord said unto him: Arise, why hast thou fallen?
8 And he saith unto the Lord: I saw the finger of the Lord, and I feared lest he should smite me; for I knew not that the Lord had flesh and blood.
9 And the Lord said unto him: Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger. Sawest thou more than this?
10 And he answered: Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.
11 And the Lord said unto him: Believest thou the words which I shall speak?
12 And he answered: Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.
13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.
14 Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.
15 And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast. Seest thou that ye are created after mine own image? Yea, even all men were created in the beginning after mine own image.
16 Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh (Ether 3:6-16).

The most important answer we learn from that conversation is that the Savior’s spirit body looked like his physical body, and therefore, also like his future resurrected body. There are other places that infer it, such as the creation story:

27 So the Gods went down to organize man in their own image, in the image of the Gods to form they him, male and female to form they them. (Genesis 1:26-28; Abraham 4:26-28; Moses 6:8-12, 2:26-28.)

But there is no other place that tells us unequivocally that our spirit bodies and our physical bodies are patterned the same way. That information is vital to us because it is the premise upon which we build our entire concept of the premortal spirit world.

One of the questions the story asks is, How did the brother of Jared come up with the idea of lighting his boats with rocks that shine. Hugh Nibley answers that one for us. He shows that Noah’s Ark could not have had a window as the Bible translation says, but that it had a “light giver” (translated “window”). Nibley suggests that the brother of Jared just followed Noah’s example and asked the Lord to provide him with the same light that Noah had. {1} That answers the “how” part of the question, but then it asks another question, Why was the brother of Jared so comfortable in telling the Lord how to fix the problem?

Another question is, Why was the brother of Jared so surprised that he could see Jehovah’s finger? But that is the wrong question. Wrong questions, like erroneous premises, lead to incorrect conclusions. He was not surprised that Jehovah had a finger. What he said was, “I knew not that the Lord had flesh and blood.” No doubt, he understood that Jehovah was a spirit. Therefore, what he saw seemed to call into question everything he knew about God. Therefore, the Lord responded to his concern:

9 And the Lord said unto him: Because of thy faith thou hast seen that I shall take upon me flesh and blood; and never has man come before me with such exceeding faith as thou hast; for were it not so ye could not have seen my finger.

Another question is, Why did the Lord interview him before touching the stones? The Lord asked two questions, and received two appropriate responses:

9 … Sawest thou more than this?
10 And he answered: Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.
11 And the Lord said unto him: Believest thou the words which I shall speak?
12 And he answered: Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.

The first question, “Sawest thou more than this?” seems strange because we would suppose that the Lord already knew what he saw. However, the question left it to the brother of Jared to make the next request, “Nay; Lord, show thyself unto me.”

That request required another interview question: “Believest thou the words which I shall speak?” And again the brother of Jared gave the correct answer, “Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.”

This is not strange. The question and answer sequence before one sees the Lord within the shechinah is consistent with other accounts. This one in First Nephi is an example:

1 For it came to pass after I had desired to know the things that my father had seen, and believing that the Lord was able to make them known unto me, as I sat pondering in mine heart I was caught away in the Spirit of the Lord, yea, into an exceedingly high mountain, which I never had before seen, and upon which I never had before set my foot.
2 And the Spirit said unto me: Behold, what desirest thou?
3 And I said: I desire to behold the things which my father saw.
4 And the Spirit said unto me: Believest thou that thy father saw the tree of which he hath spoken?
5 And I said: Yea, thou knowest that I believe all the words of my father (1 Nephi 11:1-5).

The questions and answers are not the same in both interviews, but they are strikingly similar.

One of the brother of Jared’s answers expresses a truly amazing concept.

12 And he answered: Yea, Lord, I know that thou speakest the truth, for thou art a God of truth, and canst not lie.

We live in a world where telling the absolute truth is something we rarely if ever do, and almost never expect. Most of the things we say are only approximations of reality. For example, much of what our teachers tell us in school will not be “true” a generation from now, and we accept that without concern. Another example is that we say we will be somewhere and a given time, but five, or even ten minutes before or after is usually acceptable and even expected. (When my wife tells me that she is going shopping and will be back in an hour, I understand that to mean she does not expect to be gone all day.) For the most part we consider these near-truths as perfectly acceptable. In our cultural context, the notion that there is a God who “canst not lie” requires that we deal with him differently than with any human being we know. That, in turn, requires us to approach God with an entirely different mind-set than the one we are accustomed to. That, in turn, requires that we must know our Selves with honest clarity.

Another intriguing question is, Why did the Lord say, “And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast.”

To discover the answer, we must limit our search of examples to events that preceded the time of the Brother of Jared, but we can also look to events after that to discover patterns and principles.

Because we do not know a date for the brother of Jared, the only prophets we can be sure lived earlier than he were those patriarchs who were before the flood. Of those, God conversed with Adam (Moses 6:22); “And the Lord ordained Noah after his own order (Moses 8:19).” And in the Pearl of Great Price, Moses chapters 5 & 6 describe an extended conversation between God and Enoch, during which:

27 And Enoch beheld angels descending out of heaven, bearing testimony of the Father and Son; and the Holy Ghost fell on many, and they were caught up by the powers of heaven into Zion.
28 And it came to pass that the God of heaven looked upon the residue of the people, and he wept; and Enoch bore record of it, saying: How is it that the heavens weep, and shed forth their tears as the rain upon the mountains?
29 And Enoch said unto the Lord: How is it that thou canst weep, seeing thou art holy, and from all eternity to all eternity? (Moses 7:27-29)

All we have to find is one instance of a prophet who saw God before the time of the brother of Jared to cause us to wonder why the Lord said, “And never have I showed myself unto man whom I have created, for never has man believed in me as thou hast.”

There is one very likely answer which would make the Lord’s statement a simple truth, and teach us a great deal about his relationship with the brother of Jared.

Most of the examples we have of prophets seeing the Lord are in conjunction with their sode experiences. In those cases the prophets are brought into God’s presence as in 1 Nephi 1:8-14 and Isaiah 6:1-13 (2 Nephi 16 is a better version). In all of those instances the prophet is brought to where God is. Or, as in Joseph’s First Vision, God chooses to come to where the prophet is. But there is no other place is the scriptures where a prophet summons God to come to him, which is what the brother of Jared did. That is unique! And would certainly account for the Lord’s saying “for never has man believed in me as thou hast.”

The questions and answers I have pointed out are the obvious ones. They are only subsets to the real questions: What was the personal relationship between the premortal Jehovah and the now-mortal brother of Jared? That in turn asks, What was their premortal friendship/covenant relationship (hesed), and how/why did it remain intact after the brother of Jared entered the mortal world? And that opens a whole bouquet of other questions!
——————-
FOOTNOTE

{1} (Hugh Nibley, An Approach to the Book of Mormon, 3rd ed. [Salt Lake City and Provo: Deseret Book Co., Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1988], 348.)

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 3:6-16 – The Conversation between the Lord and the brother of Jared – LeGrand Baker

Ether 3:13 – ‘Redeem,’ to Come into the Presence of God – LeGrand Baker

The word “redeem” has three different meanings in the scriptures. In the Book of Mormon it almost always means to be brought into the presence of God, just as it does in Ether 3:13.

13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed [present tense] from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you (Ether 3:13).

In the New Testament, the Greek word translated as “redeem” is a commercial or diplomatic term that means to purchase or to ransom. The word worked well for Christians who used it to describe our relationship with the Savior. He purchases our sins and ransoms us from hell. {1}

The Hebrew word in the Old Testament means the same thing, except the Law of Moses requires that a relative redeem someone who is in bondage. The person who does this is called the “redeemer.” Because that is a Jewish rather than a Greek concept, there is no Greek word that means one who redeems, so the word “redeemer” is not found in the New Testament. {2} Even though the Greek words do not convey the idea of a family relationship, almost all of the ways the words “redeem” and “redeemed” are used in the New Testament focus on the ideas of one’s being a child and an heir of God.

There are also places in the Old Testament where redeem means to be brought into the presence of God. Job laments:

23 Oh that my words were now written! Oh that they were printed in a book!
24 That they were graven with an iron pen and lead in the rock for ever!
25 For I know that my Redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:
27 Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me (Job 19:23-27).

Job’s testimony is that because the Redeemer lives, Job shall see God. That same meaning is also found in the psalms. An example is Psalm 49 where to be redeemed means to be brought from the grave and into the presence of God:

14 Like sheep they are laid in the grave; death shall feed on them; and the upright shall have ominion over them in the morning; and their beauty shall consume in the grave from their dwelling.
15 But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave: for he shall receive me.(Psalm 49:14-15).

In the Book of Mormon, “redeem” sometimes means to purchase or ransom just as it does in the Bible. But the most frequent meaning is the one found in Job. That is, to be brought into the presence of God. However, while that is the simple denotation, the connotation is much more complex than that.

Samuel the Lamanite explained that “the resurrection of Christ redeemeth mankind, yea, even all mankind, and bringeth them back into the presence of the Lord.” However, he also says that only the righteous will be able to stay there. The context in which he said that is as follows:

14 And behold, again, another sign I give unto you, yea, a sign of his death.
15 For behold, he surely must die that salvation may come; yea, it behooveth him and becometh expedient that he dieth, to bring to pass the resurrection of the dead, that thereby men may be brought into the presence of the Lord.
16 Yea, behold, this death bringeth to pass the resurrection, and redeemeth all mankind from the first death—that spiritual death; for all mankind, by the fall of Adam being cut off from the presence of the Lord, are considered as dead, both as to things temporal and to things spiritual.
17 But behold, the resurrection of Christ redeemeth mankind, yea, even all mankind, and bringeth them back into the presence of the Lord.
18 Yea, and it bringeth to pass the condition of repentance, that whosoever repenteth the same is not hewn down and cast into the fire; but whosoever repenteth not is hewn down and cast into the fire; and there cometh upon them again a spiritual death, yea, a second death, for they are cut off again as to things pertaining to righteousness [zedek] (Helaman 14:14-18).

Both Mormon and Moroni taught the same doctrine. Mormon wrote:

6 And he bringeth to pass the resurrection of the dead, whereby man must be raised to stand before his judgment-seat.
7 And he hath brought to pass the redemption of the world, whereby he that is found guiltless before him at the judgment day hath it given unto him to dwell in the presence of God in his kingdom, to sing ceaseless praises with the choirs above, unto the Father, and unto the Son, and unto the Holy Ghost, which are one God, in a state of happiness which hath no end (Mormon 7:6-7).

Moroni clarified it even further:

12 Behold, he created Adam, and by Adam came the fall of man. And because of the fall of man came Jesus Christ, even the Father and the Son; and because of Jesus Christ came the redemption of man.
13 And because of the redemption of man, which came by Jesus Christ, they are brought back into the presence of the Lord; yea, this is wherein all men are redeemed, because the death of Christ bringeth to pass the resurrection, which bringeth to pass a redemption from an endless sleep, from which sleep all men shall be awakened by the power of God when the trump shall sound; and they shall come forth, both small and great, and all shall stand before his bar, being redeemed and loosed from this eternal band of death, which death is a temporal death (Mormon 9:12-13).

Alma taught that this universal redemption is a necessary part of the justice of God.

14 For our words will condemn us, yea, all our works will condemn us; we shall not be found spotless; and our thoughts will also condemn us; and in this awful state we shall not dare to look up to our God; and we would fain be glad if we could command the rocks and the mountains to fall upon us to hide us from his presence.
15 But this cannot be; we must come forth and stand before him in his glory, and in his power, and in his might, majesty, and dominion, and acknowledge to our everlasting shame that all his judgments are just; that he is just in all his works, and that he is merciful unto the children of men, and that he has all power to save every man that believeth on his name and bringeth forth fruit meet for repentance.
16 And now behold, I say unto you then cometh a death, even a second death, which is a spiritual death; then is a time that whosoever dieth in his sins, as to a temporal death, shall also die a spiritual death; yea, he shall die as to things pertaining unto righteousness (Alma 12:14-16).

Alma further explained:

15 And now, the plan of mercy could not be brought about except an atonement should be made; therefore God himself atoneth for the sins of the world, to bring about the plan of mercy, to appease the demands of justice, that God might be a perfect, just God, and a merciful God also (Alma 42:15).

Because of the Savior’s Atonement, mercy enables us to repent. It gives us the power to choose to repent or to choose to not repent. Thus, as we pass through the stages of our existence from intelligences until we are resurrected, mercy enables us to become (evolve into) precisely what we choose to become according to our own desires for gratification, happiness, and joy. Thus, because of the Savior’s mercy, when we stand before him on judgement day we will be the Self we have both designed and created. Then mercy will have accomplished its purpose and justice seals us as what we have chosen to be. Lehi explained why that must be so:

10 And because of the intercession for all, all men come unto God; wherefore, they stand in the presence of him, to be judged of him according to the truth and holiness which is in him. Wherefore, the ends of the law which the Holy One hath given, unto the inflicting of the punishment which is affixed, which punishment that is affixed is in opposition to that of the happiness which is affixed, to answer the ends of the atonement (2 Nephi 2:10).

Alma explains how it is the immutable law of justice, not the merciful God, that punishes the sinner.

22 But there is a law given, and a punishment affixed, and a repentance granted; which repentance, mercy claimeth; otherwise, justice claimeth the creature and executeth the law, and the law inflicteth the punishment; if not so, the works of justice would be destroyed, and God would cease to be God (Alma 42:22).

That was the promise from the beginning. After Adam and Eve left the Garden, they were taught the meaning of sacrifice:

9 And in that day the Holy Ghost fell upon Adam, which beareth record of the Father and the Son, saying: I am the Only Begotten of the Father from the beginning, henceforth and forever, that as thou hast fallen thou mayest be redeemed, and all mankind, even as many as will (Moses 5:9).

Thus, it is “the universal plan of redemption” that guarantees the perfect justice and the perfect mercy of God.

There is also an “individual plan of redemption” that is discussed in the Book of Mormon and is a part of the “plan of salvation” that enables the righteous to remain in the presence of God.

Alma uses the phrase “plan of redemption” to show that a purpose of the ancient Nephite temple drama was to teach them how to enter God’s presence. In Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, we drew attention to some interesting parts of his explanation.

28 And after God had appointed that these things should come unto man [that is, at the Council in Heaven when the decisions and assignments were made], behold, then he saw that it was expedient that man should know concerning the things whereof he had appointed unto them;
29 Therefore he sent angels [We don’t know how many, three, perhaps.] to converse with them, who caused men to behold of his glory. [The object of the angels’ coming was to teach people how to enter God’s presence.]
30 And they [the people] began from that time forth to call on his name [so the angels taught them how to pray]; therefore God conversed with men [the Father himself spoke], and made known unto them the plan of redemption [“redeem” in the Book of Mormon often means to enter God’s presence (Ether 3:13; 2 Nephi 1:15, 2:1-3; Helaman 8:23)], which had been prepared from the foundation of the world; and this he made known unto them according to [that is, these were the methods or teaching tools he used for instructions] their faith [pistis, the substance and evidence of the covenants {3}] and repentance [repentance is a very efficient teacher] and their holy works [“holy” means holy, so “holy works” were probably the ordinances and covenants performed during the ancient temple drama; that is, the ordinances were also a source of instruction].
31 Wherefore, he gave commandments unto men, they having first transgressed the first commandments as to things which were temporal [“temporal” is time-related, so he was probably talking about the commandments associated with linear time] and becoming as gods, knowing good from evil [that is very different from “good and evil”], placing themselves in a state to act, or being placed in a state to act according to their wills and pleasures, whether to do evil or to do good——
32 Therefore God gave unto them commandments, after having made known unto them the plan of redemption [again, having taught them how to come into his presence], that they should not do evil, the penalty thereof being a second death, which was an everlasting death as to things pertaining unto righteousness [righteousness is zedek, which is correctness in priesthood and temple things, so the second death he was talking about is the state of being without zedek-type blessings]; for on such the plan of redemption could have no power [without zedek, one cannot come into God’s presence], for the works of justice could not be destroyed, according to the supreme goodness of God.
33 But God did call on men, in the name of his Son (this being the plan of redemption which was laid), saying: If ye will repent and harden not your hearts, then will I have mercy upon you, through mine Only Begotten Son;
34 Therefore, whosoever repenteth, and hardeneth not his heart, he shall have claim on mercy through mine Only Begotten Son, unto a remission of his sins; and these shall enter into my rest.
35 And whosoever will harden his heart and will do iniquity, behold, I swear in my wrath that he shall not enter into my rest.
36 And now, my brethren, behold I say unto you, that if ye will harden your hearts ye shall not enter into the rest of the Lord; therefore your iniquity provoketh him that he sendeth down his wrath upon you as in the first provocation, yea, according to his word in the last provocation as well as the first, to the everlasting destruction of your souls; therefore, according to his word, unto the last death, as well as the first.
37 And now, my brethren, seeing we know these things, and they are true, let us repent, and harden not our hearts, that we provoke not the Lord our God to pull down his wrath upon us in these his second commandments which he has given unto us; but let us enter into the rest of God, which is prepared according to his word (Alma 12:28-37). {4}

A simple, but perhaps simplistic summation of that is the Plan of Redemption brings unto the presence of God and the Plan of Salvation enables us to stay there. Alma’s summary of the ancient Nephite temple drama seems to suggest that it was a kind of dress rehearsal to teach the Nephites the Plan of Redemption.

A relevant question is: when did the redemption become a reality for the Nephites. The answer was probably the same as the explanation in the Doctrine and Covenants. The promise is:

1 Verily, thus saith the Lord: It shall come to pass that every soul who forsaketh his sins and cometh unto me, and calleth on my name, and obeyeth my voice, and keepeth my commandments, shall see my face and know that I am (D&C 93:1).

The conditions are these:

65 And if ye ask anything that is not expedient for you, it shall turn unto your condemnation.
66 Behold, that which you hear is as the voice of one crying in the wilderness—in the wilderness, because you cannot see him—my voice, because my voice is Spirit; my Spirit is truth; truth abideth and hath no end; and if it be in you it shall abound.
67 And if your eye be single to my glory, your whole bodies shall be filled with light, and there shall be no darkness in you; and that body which is filled with light comprehendeth all things.
68 Therefore, sanctify yourselves that your minds become single to God, and the days will come that you shall see him; for he will unveil his face unto you, and it shall be in his own time, and in his own way, and according to his own will (D&C 88:65-68).

His will is, of course, determined by our personal needs. We are here to be tested. If we were to be taught too much, too fast, our knowledge would destroy our agency. So it is reasonable to believe that our individual need is determined by our individual assignment. If the assignment requires it in this life, then it will happen. If the assignment we are asked to fulfill in this life does not require it, then it will happen in the next life.

There are those for whom it is necessary now, and the Book of Mormon teaches us about that. In addition to the one quoted above about the brother of Jared, there are several others. It is interesting to note that in almost all of these examples, their redemption is described in past tense, but its blessings are still described in present tense. One of the most beautiful examples is the one spoken by Lehi:

15 But behold, the Lord hath redeemed my soul from hell [past tense]; I have beheld his glory, and I am encircled about eternally in the arms of his love (2 Nephi 1:15).

Another is Lehi’s blessing to his son Jacob:

2 Nevertheless, Jacob, my first-born in the wilderness, thou knowest the greatness of God; and he shall consecrate thine afflictions for thy gain.
3 Wherefore, thy soul shall be blessed, and thou shalt dwell safely with thy brother, Nephi; and thy days shall be spent in the service of thy God. Wherefore, I know that thou art redeemed, because of the righteousness of thy Redeemer; for thou hast beheld that in the fulness of time he cometh to bring salvation unto men.
4 And thou hast beheld in thy youth his glory (2 Nephi 2:2-4a).

Another example is Nephi’s writing about himself, his brother Jacob, and Isaiah:

2 And now I, Nephi, write more of the words of Isaiah, for my soul delighteth in his words. For I will liken his words unto my people, and I will send them forth unto all my children, for he verily saw my Redeemer, even as I have seen him.
3 And my brother, Jacob, also has seen him as I have seen him; wherefore, I will send their words forth unto my children to prove unto them that my words are true. Wherefore, by the words of three, God hath said, I will establish my word. Nevertheless, God sendeth more witnesses, and he proveth all his words (2 Nephi 11:2-3).

In another place Nephi brackets his charity with his having been redeemed.

6 I glory in plainness; I glory in truth; I glory in my Jesus, for he hath redeemed my soul from hell.
7 I have charity for my people, and great faith in Christ that I shall meet many souls spotless at his judgment-seat (2 Nephi 33:6-7).

Alma left us with this testimony in which he equates redemption with being “born of God.”

24 For, said he [Alma], I have repented of my sins, and have been redeemed of the Lord ; behold I am born of the Spirit.
25 And the Lord said unto me: Marvel not that all mankind, yea, men and women, all nations, kindreds, tongues and people, must be born again; yea, born of God, changed from their carnal and fallen state, to a state of righteousness, being redeemed of God, becoming his sons and daughters;
26 And thus they become new creatures; and unless they do this, they can in nowise inherit the kingdom of God.
27 I say unto you, unless this be the case, they must be cast off; and this I know, because I was like to be cast off.
28 Nevertheless, after wading through much tribulation, repenting nigh unto death, the Lord in mercy hath seen fit to snatch me out of an everlasting burning, and I am born of God (Mosiah 27:23-28).

Adam understood the full impact of “thou mayest be redeemed” and he said:

10 Blessed be the name of God, for because of my transgression my eyes are opened, and in this life I shall have joy, and again in the flesh I shall see God (Moses 5:10).

It is significant that the Savior emphasized that same relationship of ideas in the Beatitudes:

8 Blessed are all the pure in heart [Zion], for they shall see God.
9 And blessed are all the peacemakers, for they shall be called [covenant new name] the children of God (3 Nephi 12:8-9).

The prophet Abinadi’s testimony to Alma uses different words, but carries the same message:

23 They are raised to dwell with God who has redeemed them; thus they have eternal life through Christ, who has broken the bands of death (Mosiah 15:23).

One of my favorite examples is the conclusion of Helaman’s letter to Moroni. It gives us a powerful insight into the very intimate friendship shared by these two great prophets:

41 And now, my beloved brother, Moroni, may the Lord our God, who has redeemed us and made us free [both in past tense], keep you continually in his presence; yea, and may he favor this people, even that ye may have success in obtaining the possession of all that which the Lamanites have taken from us, which was for our support. And now, behold, I close mine epistle. I am Helaman, the son of Alma (Alma 58:41). {5}

If the whole plan of salvation were reduced to a single sentence, the first part of that sentence would be about the Savior’s Atonement, and the last part might read: “that one might return and remain in the presence of God.”

In the 2007 October general conference, Elder David A. Bednar explained the importance of the phrase to “come unto Christ.”

The risen Lord next explained the importance of coming unto Him. The multitude gathered together at the temple was invited literally to come forth unto the Savior “one by one” (3 Nephi 11:15) to feel the prints of the nails in the Master’s hands and feet and to thrust their hands into His side. Each individual who had this experience “did know of a surety and did bear record, that it was he” (v. 15), even Jesus Christ, who had come.
The Savior also taught the people to come unto Him through sacred covenants, and He reminded them that they were “the children of the covenant” (3 Nephi 20:26).
Repenting and coming unto Christ through the covenants and ordinances of salvation are prerequisite to and a preparation for being sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost and standing spotless before God at the last day. {6}

—————————
FOOTNOTES

{1} See Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, chapters “A Meaning of ‘Redeem’— to ‘Come Unto Christ’” and “Alma Chapter 5: the Song of Redeeming Love,” (paper back edition in this website), pages 510-38.

{2} The words “redeem” and “redeemed” are only found in only a few places in the New Testament. They are: Luke 24:13-25; Galatians 3:1-16, 4:1-9; Titus 2:8-15; Revelation 5:1-12, 14:1-9.

{3} See Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, the chapter called, “Meaning of Faith —pistis.”

{4} Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, second edition (the one in this website), 556-558

{5} More examples of “redeem” meaning to be brought into the presence of God are Jacob 6:8-9; Mosiah 26:21-28; Alma 13:1-6, 19:6-14, 36:22-26, 58:41; Helaman 8:22-23, 14:15-19; Mormon 9:12-14; Moroni 7:2-4; D&C 43:29-30, 88:14-32, 138:58-60, and even thought the word is not there, one must also include the Lord’s promise to Everyman in D&C 93:1-5.

{6} David A. Bednar,“Clean Hands and a Pure Heart.” Ensign 37, 11 (November 2007): 80-83.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 

Posted in Ether | Comments Off on Ether 3:13 – ‘Redeem,’ to Come into the Presence of God – LeGrand Baker