John 11:1-5 & John 12:1-11, et al — The Women in the New Testament whom Jesus Knew and Loved — LeGrand Baker

John the Beloved payed special attention to the story of Lazarus and his two sisters Martha and Mary, telling us “Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus (John 11:1-5).” While these are the only women about whom we are told explicitly that “Jesus loved,” we also know that his entire life and all his dealings with people were an expression of his abundant love. Therefore, it seems appropriate that we look at other instances of Jesus’s interaction with women whom he, no doubt, also loved.

The first, of course, was his mother who knew from before his birth who her baby boy really was. She “kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart” until she shared them with Luke so he would write them and we could also know (Luke 2:19, 51). She stood at the foot of the cross where Jesus died, and was among those whom he met after his resurrection, to teach the ultimate mysteries of godliness, as is reported in the apocryphal Pistis Sophia.{1}

Elisabeth, Mary’s elder cousin and the mother of John the Baptist. We know nothing about her after Jesus’s birth, but they were family, and families are important. So unless there were geographic or other circumstances that prevented their close association, we may assume that she and her son were important to Jesus as he matured.

There was a prophetess named Anna who publicly rejoiced when she saw him as a baby in the temple, but we know nothing else about her (Luke 2:22-40).

There were many anonymous women who appear throughout the gospel accounts of Jesus’s life. These were those whom Jesus healed, or those who followed and supported him.

The 5,000 whom Jesus fed with just five loves and two fishes were all men, “beside women and children.” Even though the women were not counted, there were probably as many or more women among those followers as there were men. (Matthew 14:19-21)

Among the unnamed women whose stories are told are these:

The woman of Samaria whom Jesus asked for a drink and who testified to the people of her village that he was the Messiah. (John 4:5-44)

One who touched the hem of his garment, who was diseased with an issue of blood, and who was made whole from that hour. (Matthew 9:20-22)

A woman of Canaan whose “daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.” To whom Jesus said, “O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.” (Matthew 15:21-28)

Simon Peter’s wife’s mother whom Jesus healed from a fever. (Mark 1:29 – 33)

The woman with “a spirit of infirmity” who was healed on the sabbath day. (Luke 13:11 – 17)

There are short lists of women disciples in Luke 8:1-3 and Mark 15:40-41. Mark is quoted hereafter. Luke reads:

1 And it came to pass afterward, that he went throughout every city and village, preaching and shewing the glad tidings of the kingdom of God: and the twelve were with him,
2 And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils,
3 And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod’s steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance. (Luke 8:1 – 3)

The statement in Luke, “And certain women, which had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities, Mary called Magdalene, out of whom went seven devils,” is perplexing because its meaning is not explicit. As is frequently shown in the New Testament, those people did not understand the causes of sickness but frequently attributed illness to evil spirits. So the statement in question most probably meant that she had been healed of some physical illness or disability. Another possibility is that “seven” is a sacred number, meaning whole and complete. So “seven devils” might mean that she was cleansed from all spiritual impurities. But it probably does not mean that she had been “possessed” by evil spirits.

Another unnamed woman brought “an alabaster box” of very precious ointment.

36 And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee’s house, and sat down to meat.
37 And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster box of ointment,
38 And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment (Luke 7:36-38).

The story is told differently in Matthew.

7 There came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on his head, as he sat at meat.
8 But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?
9 For this ointment might have been sold for much, and given to the poor.
10 When Jesus understood it, he said unto them, Why trouble ye the woman? for she hath wrought a good work upon me.
11 For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.
12 For in that she hath poured this ointment on my body, she did it for my burial (Matthew 26:6-14).

Even though those women are nameless, the details of their stories are similar to when Mary anointed Jesus feet with a costly ointment. It is told by John as the conclusion of his account of the Savior’s raising her brother Lazarus from the dead.

1 Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.
2 There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.
3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.
4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which should betray him,
5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?
6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.
8 For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
9 Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus’ sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.
10 But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;
11 Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus (John 12:1-11).

The other stories of woman occur either at the cross or at the sepulchre from which Jesus was resurrected.

========================
The Women at the Cross
========================

———– Matthew —————

55 And many women were there beholding afar off, which followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering unto him:
56 Among which was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee’s children (Matthew 27:55-56).

———– Mark —————

40 There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;
41 (Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem (Mark 15:40-41).

———– Luke —————

27 And there followed him a great company of people, and of women, which also bewailed and lamented him.
28 But Jesus turning unto them said, Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children.
29 For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
30 Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.
31 For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?
………….
48 And all the people that came together to that sight, beholding the things which were done, smote their breasts, and returned.
49 And all his acquaintance, and the women that followed him from Galilee, stood afar off, beholding these things (Luke 23:27-31, 48-49).

———– John —————

25 Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene.
26 When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!
27 Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home (John 19:25-27).

========================
At the Sepulchre
========================

———– Matthew —————

59 And when Joseph [of Arimathæa] had taken the body, he wrapped it in a clean linen cloth,
60 And laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock: and he rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed.
61 And there was Mary Magdalene, and the other Mary, sitting over against the sepulchre (Matthew 27:59-61).
…………………
1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.
3 His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow:
4 And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men.
5 And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.
7 And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you.
8 And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.
9 And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him.
10 Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me (Matthew 28:1-10).

———– Mark —————

45 And when he [Pilate] knew it of the centurion, he gave the body to Joseph.
46 And he bought fine linen, and took him down, and wrapped him in the linen, and laid him in a sepulchre which was hewn out of a rock, and rolled a stone unto the door of the sepulchre.
47 And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses beheld where he was laid (Mark 15:45-47).
…………………..
1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.
2 And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.
3 And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre?
4 And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.
5 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.
6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.
7 But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.
8 And they went out quickly, and fled from the sepulchre; for they trembled and were amazed: neither said they any thing to any man; for they were afraid.
9 Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.
10 And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept.
11 And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not (Mark 16:1-11).

———– Luke —————

53 And he [Joseph of Arimathæ a] took it down [the body of Jesus], and wrapped it in linen, and laid it in a sepulchre that was hewn in stone, wherein never man before was laid.
54 And that day was the preparation, and the sabbath drew on.
55 And the women also, which came with him from Galilee, followed after, and beheld the sepulchre, and how his body was laid.
56 And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the sabbath day according to the commandment (Luke 23:53-56).
…………………
1 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.
2 And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.
3 And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus.
4 And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments:
5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?
6 He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee,
7 Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.
8 And they remembered his words,
9 And returned from the sepulchre, and told all these things unto the eleven, and to all the rest.
10 It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles.
11 And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not (Luke 24:1-11).

———– John —————

1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
2 Then she runneth, and cometh to Simon Peter, and to the other disciple, whom Jesus loved, and saith unto them, They have taken away the Lord out of the sepulchre, and we know not where they have laid him.
3 Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulchre.
…………….
10 Then the disciples went away again unto their own home.
11 But Mary stood without at the sepulchre weeping: and as she wept, she stooped down, and looked into the sepulchre,
12 And seeth two angels in white sitting, the one at the head, and the other at the feet, where the body of Jesus had lain.
13 And they say unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? She saith unto them, Because they have taken away my Lord, and I know not where they have laid him.
14 And when she had thus said, she turned herself back, and saw Jesus standing, and knew not that it was Jesus.
15 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why weepest thou? whom seekest thou? She, supposing him to be the gardener, saith unto him, Sir, if thou have borne him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away.
16 Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master.
17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
18 Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that he had spoken these things unto her.
19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
20 And when he had so said, he shewed unto them his hands and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord (John 20:1-20).

————————–
FOOTNOTE

{1} Pistis Sophia is an apocryphal that tells of the eleven apostles, and their wives, and Jesus’s mother Mary, and Mary Magdalene meeting together to pray. They were joined by the resurrected Savior who taught them many things.
A translation by G. S. R. Mead is available on the website of The Gnostic Society Library.
Hugh Nibley has written an excellent summation and explanation in Appendix IV of The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri: An Egyptian Endowment.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in John, Other New Testament Books | Comments Off on John 11:1-5 & John 12:1-11, et al — The Women in the New Testament whom Jesus Knew and Loved — LeGrand Baker

John 11:1-45 — Lazarus whom Jesus loved – LeGrand Baker

This is a story whose simple beauty makes it one of the most renowned in Christian literature. While its beauty is easy to grasp, its complex meaning seems to be so deeply buried that it cannot be excavated. John uses it as an introduction to a story he is about to tell—or else as the conclusion of that story he has not yet told. He identifies Mary as “It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair.” It is important to him that we know that, even though, in the sequence of his narrative, it has not yet happened.

The message of all the gospels in the New Testament can be reduced to a single theme. That theme is the inclusiveness of Jesus’s love for everyone. It says he had compassion for those whom he forgave, or healed, and the 5,000 whom he fed. It says he loved the Twelve as a group. But there are only five individuals who are mentioned by name as persons whom Jesus loved. Those 5 are:

(1) John the Beloved— “the disciple whom Jesus loved” (John 13:23, 19:26, 21:7, 20:2, 21:20);

(2) The rich young ruler who asked “what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?” (Matthew 19:16-22, Mark 10:17-22, Luke 18:18-27) Mark tells us, “Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest… (Mark 10:21).” Circumstantial evidence suggests that this young man would become the apostle Paul.{1}

(3,4, & 5) Lazarus and his sisters, Martha and Mary. In telling the story, John mentions Jesus loved the sisters (Martha by name), but John focuses on the Savior’s love for Lazarus.
In the first five verses we learn:

1 Now a certain man was sick, named Lazarus, of Bethany, the town of Mary and her sister Martha.
2 (It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick.)
3 Therefore his sisters sent unto him, saying, Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick.
4 When Jesus heard that, he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby.
5 Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus (John 11:1-5).

Later, as he approached Lazarus’s tomb, we see the depth of Jesus’s love for Lazarus.

35 Jesus wept.
36 Then said the Jews, Behold how he loved him! (John 11:36)

————————

The events of Lazarus’s being raised from the dead are only described by John, but we are introduced to the sisters by Luke. From him we learn that the house belonged to Martha, leaving us to surmise that Mary was a younger sister, and was either a guest or a resident in Martha’s home.

38 Now it came to pass, as they went, that he entered into a certain village: and a certain woman named Martha received him into her house.
39 And she had a sister called Mary, which also sat at Jesus’ feet, and heard his word.
40 But Martha was cumbered about much serving, and came to him, and said, Lord, dost thou not care that my sister hath left me to serve alone? bid her therefore that she help me.
41 And Jesus answered and said unto her, Martha, Martha, thou art careful and troubled about many things:
42 But one thing is needful: and Mary hath chosen that good part, which shall not be taken away from her (Luke 10:38 – 42).

The following is the story the way John tells it.

1 Now a certain man was sick, named Lazarus, of Bethany, the town of Mary and her sister Martha.
2 (It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick.)
3 Therefore his sisters sent unto him, saying, Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick.
4 When Jesus heard that, he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby.
5 Now Jesus loved Martha, and her sister, and Lazarus.
6 When he had heard therefore that he was sick, he abode two days still in the same place where he was.
7 Then after that saith he to his disciples, Let us go into Judæa again.
8 His disciples say unto him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee; and goest thou thither again?
9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not, because he seeth the light of this world.
10 But if a man walk in the night, he stumbleth, because there is no light in him.
11 These things said he: and after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep.
12 Then said his disciples, Lord, if he sleep, he shall do well.
13 Howbeit Jesus spake of his death: but they thought that he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep.
14 Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead.
15 And I am glad for your sakes that I was not there, to the intent ye may believe; nevertheless let us go unto him.
16 Then said Thomas, which is called Didymus, unto his fellowdisciples, Let us also go, that we may die with him.
17 Then when Jesus came, he found that he had lain in the grave four days already.
18 Now Bethany was nigh unto Jerusalem, about fifteen furlongs off:
19 And many of the Jews came to Martha and Mary, to comfort them concerning their brother.
20 Then Martha, as soon as she heard that Jesus was coming, went and met him: but Mary sat still in the house.
21 Then said Martha unto Jesus, Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died.
22 But I know, that even now, whatsoever thou wilt ask of God, God will give it thee.
23 Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again.
24 Martha saith unto him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day.
25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believet h in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
27 She saith unto him, Yea, Lord: I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God, which should come into the world.
28 And when she had so said, she went her way, and called Mary her sister secretly, saying, The Master is come, and calleth for thee.
29 As soon as she heard that, she arose quickly, and came unto him.
30 Now Jesus was not yet come into the town, but was in that place where Martha met him.
31 The Jews then which were with her in the house, and comforted her, when they saw Mary, that she rose up hastily and went out, followed her, saying, She goeth unto the grave to weep there.
32 Then when Mary was come where Jesus was, and saw him, she fell down at his feet, saying unto him, Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died.
33 When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews also weeping which came with her, he groaned in the spirit, and was troubled,
34 And said, Where have ye laid him? They said unto him, Lord, come and see.
35 Jesus wept.
36 Then said the Jews, Behold how he loved him!
37 And some of them said, Could not this man, which opened the eyes of the blind, have caused that even this man should not have died?
38 Jesus therefore again groaning in himself cometh to the grave. It was a cave, and a stone lay upon it.
39 Jesus said, Take ye away the stone. Martha, the sister of him that was dead, saith unto him, Lord, by this time he stinketh: for he hath been dead four days.
40 Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?
41 Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid. And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me.
42 And I knew that thou hearest me always: but because of the people which stand by I said it, that they may believe that thou hast sent me.
43 And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.
45 Then many of the Jews which came to Mary, and had seen the things which Jesus did, believed on him. (John 11:1-45)
—————————–

FOOTNOTE

{1}The evidence that the rich young man is Paul is circumstantial but quite convincing.
(1) He was rich, as was Paul who was from a free Roman city and a wealthy tent maker.
(2) He was a young ruler, that is a member of the Sanhedrin, as was Paul.
(3) He was a “young man.” That phrase describes someone who was about 30 or 32, not old enough to be called an elder, but old enough that he could speak in the synagogue, or in his case, in the Sanhedrin. He and Paul were about the same age as Jesus,
(5) Paul was then in Jerusalem, so the geography works as well.
(6) He describes himself as being very devout, in much the same was as Paul did when he was before Agrippa (Acts 26:1-28).
(7) Most important, Jesus’s charge to the young man was an Apostolic call. He did not ask just anyone to sell all they had and follow him. Later, when the resurrected Savior confronted Paul on the road to Damascus, he did not reissue the call, but rather said, “it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks (Acts 9:1-15).” I read that to be something like, “Stop trying to fight it, and get on with what you are supposed to do.”

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in John | Comments Off on John 11:1-45 — Lazarus whom Jesus loved – LeGrand Baker

John 11:43-44 & Hymn of the Pearl & others — LeGrand Baker)

Before we discuss the story of Lazarus, there is some background material we should examine.

These are the stories we will visit: (1) Lazarus coming from the tomb to have his burial clothes removed. (2) A young man (probably Mark) coming to Jesus at night, meeting soldiers and running away naked. (3) The young man in the Secret Gospel of Mark who, after being raised from the dead, came to Jesus to be initiated into the secrets of heaven, dressed, like Mark, only “having a linen cloth cast about his naked body.” (4) Enoch’s sode experience beginning with the necessity to remove his worldly clothing so he can be dressed in heavenly garments. (5) The Hymn of the Pearl which follows a boy from his premortal glory, through this world’s experience, to his returning to his Father. The entire story focuses on the importance of the clothes he wears during the different phases of his journey.

The crowning portion of the story of Lazarus is very brief.

43 And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go (John 11:43-44).

John’s gospel is a carefully crafted testimony that tends to give few details that are not necessary to what John wishes to teach. Here, he does not just tell us that Lazarus came out of the tomb alive, but that the Savior instructed the people to remove his burial clothes. It seems reasonable to suppose that John finds important symbolism in pointing out that removing those graveclothes was a necessary part of Lazarus’s entering his new life.
—————————

In his gospel, Mark tells the very brief account of a young man who came to Jesus on the night he was arrested. The story seems to be a side issue to the reader, but the detail makes it clear that it was important to the writer. Since New Testament authors often mention themselves in third person, some scholars believe this may be about Mark himself. It uses the same language that is found in Mark’s Secret Gospel.

51 And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:
52 And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked (Mark 14:48-52).

What the young man was wearing—and not wearing—gives us an important insight into what may have happened that evening. In this and in the Secret Gospel, both young men are dressed the same: “wearing a linen cloth over his naked body”—not really a garment, perhaps something more like a sheet, an initiatory “shield.”
———————————-

The Secret Gospel of Mark brings together both the miracle of Lazarus and the hoped-for ordinances implicit in the story of Mark’s naked young man.

A copy of the following letter was found by Dr. Morton Smith in 1958. It was written on the endpaper of a 17th century printed edition of Ignatius. Professor Smith was cataloging the library of the Mar Saba monastery, southeast of Jerusalem, when he discovered it. The book is now lost, but he photographed it so it can still be examined by scholars. No other part of the Secret Gospel is known to exist. The letter is attributed to Clement, Bishop of Alexandria. Most scholars agree that the letter is authentic as to its time and language, but they question its content. Few Christian scholars accept the notion that Jesus would have participated in secret religious rites.

The Secret Gospel of Mark, translation by Morton Smith: {1}

From the letters of the most holy Clement, the author of the Stromateis. To Theodore. You did well in silencing the unspeakable teachings of the Carpocratians. For these are the “wandering stars” referred to in the prophecy, who wander from the narrow road of the commandments into a boundless abyss of the carnal and bodily sins. For, priding themselves in knowledge, as they say, “of the deep things of Satan,” they do not know that they are casting themselves away into “the nether world of the darkness” of falsity, and, boasting that they are free, they have become slaves of servile desires. Such men are to be opposed in all ways and altogether. For, even if they should say something true, one who loves the truth should not, even so, agree with them. For not all true things are the truth, nor should that truth which merely seems true according to human opinions be preferred to the true truth, that according to the faith. Now of the things they keep saying about the divinely inspired Gospel according to Mark, some are altogether falsifications, and others, even if they do contain some true elements, nevertheless are not reported truly. For the true things being mixed with inventions, are falsified, so that, as the saying goes, even the salt loses its savor. As for Mark, then, during Peter’s stay in Rome he wrote an account of the Lord’s doings, not, however, declaring all of them, nor yet hinting at the secret ones, but selecting what he thought most useful for increasing the faith of those who were being instructed. But when Peter died a martyr, Mark came over to Alexandria, bringing both his own notes and those of Peter, from which he transferred to his former book the things suitable to whatever makes for progress toward knowledge. Thus he composed a more spiritual Gospel for the use of those who were being perfected. Nevertheless, he yet did not divulge the things not to be uttered, nor did he write down the hierophantic teaching of the Lord, but to the stories already written he added yet others and, moreover, brought in certain sayings of which he knew the interpretation would, as a mystagogue, lead the hearers into the innermost sanctuary of that truth hidden by seven veils. Thus, in sum, he prepared matters, neither grudgingly nor incautiously, in my opinion, and, dying, he left his composition to the church in Alexandria, where it even yet is most carefully guarded, being read only to those who are being initiated into the great mysteries.
But since the foul demons are always devising destruction for the race of men, Carpocrates, instructed by them and using deceitful arts, so enslaved a certain presbyter of the church in Alexandria that he got from him a copy of the secret Gospel, which he both interpreted according to his blasphemous and carnal doctrine and, moreover, polluted, mixing with the spotless and holy words utterly shameless lies. From this mixture is drawn off the teaching of the Carpocratians. To them, therefore, as I said above, one must never give way; nor, when they put forward their falsifications, should one concede that the secret Gospel is by Mark, but should even deny it on oath. For, “Not all true things are to be said to all men.” For this reason the Wisdom of God, through Solomon, advises, “Answer the fool from his folly,” teaching that the light of the truth should be hidden from those who are mentally blind. Again it says, “From him who has not shall be taken away,” and, “Let the fool walk in darkness.” But we are “children of light,” having been illuminated by “the dayspring” of the spirit of the Lord “from on high,” and “Where the Spirit of the Lord is,” it says, “there is liberty,” for “All things are pure to the pure.” To you, therefore, I shall not hesitate to answer the questions you have asked, refuting the falsifications by the very words of the Gospel. For example, after ,”And they were in the road going up to Jerusalem,” and what follows, until “After three days he shall arise,” the secret Gospel brings the following material word for word: “And they come into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus and says to him, ‘Son of David, have mercy on me.’ But the disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her into the garden where the tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway, going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon him, loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus told him what to do and in the evening the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other side of the Jordan.”After these words follows the text, “And James and John come to him,” and all that section. But “naked man with naked man,” and the other things about which you wrote, are not found. And after the words, “And he comes into Jericho,” the secret Gospel adds only,
“And the sister of the youth whom Jesus loved and his mother and Salome were there, and Jesus did not receive them.” But the many other things about which you wrote both seem to be and are falsifications. Now the true explanation and that which accords with the true philosophy…

[Here the fragment ends]
—————————–

The nakedness of these young men seems to be both factual and symbolic, and the symbolism is no less important than the fact. One would expect them to come to Jesus in a near naked state if he were going to dress them in sacred clothing, as was an import part of the ancient Israelite temple drama coronation ceremony. One cannot put on that which is sacred without first removing the mundane this-world clothing. Their coming unclothed is perfectly consistent with two principles. One is the idea of replacing the ordinary clothing with the sacred. The other is being naked in oneself. That is being humble—not wearing masks or facades when coming before the Lord. Those who come before God dressed in their riches or emblems of authority will discover that God can see through their facade into their naked soul. Both John the Beloved and Alma described the consequences. John prophesied,

15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb (Revelation 6:15-16).

And Alma warned,

13 Then if our hearts have been hardened, yea, if we have hardened our hearts against the word, insomuch that it has not been found in us, then will our state be awful, for then we shall be condemned.
14 For our words will condemn us, yea, all our works will condemn us; we shall not be found spotless; and our thoughts will also condemn us; and in this awful state we shall not dare to look up to our God; and we would fain be glad if we could command the rocks and the mountains to fall upon us to hide us from his presence.
15 But this cannot be; we must come forth and stand before him in his glory, and in his power, and in his might, majesty, and dominion, and acknowledge to our everlasting shame that all his judgments are just; that he is just in all his works, and that he is merciful unto the children of men, and that he has all power to save every man that believeth on his name and bringeth forth fruit meet for repentance (Alma 12:13-15).

A real and necessary kind of spiritual nakedness is to wear no masks but to simply be unabashedly one’s Self. So Alma asked, “Behold, are ye stripped of pride? I say unto you, if ye are not ye are not prepared to meet God (Alma 5:28).”

In sacred ordinances, one cannot be clothed in the robes of righteousness until one first removes the “filthy” clothing by which defines in this world, thus becoming “naked” before God. “Naked” does not necessarily mean nude. To be naked is to be stripped of the insignia by which one is defined, as when a court-martialed general is cashiered. He is stripped of medals that denoted his honors and rank, but he is not disrobed. He stands naked, but not nude. Similarly, when Alma instructed the Saints of his day that “they should impart of their substance of their own free will and good desires towards God, and to those priests that stood in need, yea, and to every needy, naked soul (Mosiah 18:27-30),” he was meaning those who were clothed poorly, but not nude.

An apocryphal writing reports that Jesus’s disciples asked,

“‘When will you become revealed to us and when shall we see you?’ Jesus said, ‘When you disrobe without being ashamed and take up your [clothes] and place them under your feet like little children and tread on them, then will you see the son of the living one, and you will not be afraid’” {2}
—————————–

The Secrets of Enoch describes that prophet’s sode experience. He arrived at the place where the Council in Heaven meets:

8 And the Lord said to Michael: Go and take Enoch from out of his earthly garments, and anoint him with my sweet ointment, and put him into the garments of My glory.
9 And Michael did thus, as the Lord told him. He anointed me, and dressed me, and the appearance of that ointment is more than the great light, and his ointment is like sweet dew, and its smell mild, shining like the sun’s ray, and I looked at myself, and I was like one of his glorious ones {3}

Enoch was dressed in a garment of light like those worn in the Garden by Adam and Eve. Jewish tradition holds that Adam and Eve were originally clothed in a garment of light, which Nibley suggests was the Shechinah. The loss of their garments meant the loss of all things—one’s personal relationship with God, the clothing that defined one as sacred space, food and drink that kept one’s body forever young—the loss of those things left humankind naked, vulnerable, hungry, and increasingly feeble until only death could release them from their infirmities. Yearning to return home and regaining the garment was the foundation principle of the ancient Israelite religion. The conclusion of their temple drama was an expression of hope that somehow they might regain access to the paradisiacal world, partake of the fruit, and participate in the society of the gods. {4}
—————————

The Hymn of the Pearl is a most beautiful example pre-exilic writing. It follows the pattern of the ancient Israelite temple drama and is quoted in the New Testament apocrypha in the Acts of Thomas. The poem is unique in that it focuses on the clothing worn, not worn, then worn again by the young prince. As in the cosmic myth, the hero is required to leave his first home among the Gods but first he must remove his royal clothing. He comes to this world where he dresses in mundane clothing just as do the people here. He struggles in this world until he receives a message from his Father which is a renewal of the covenants he made before he left home (the ancient temple blessings). Then he regains his royal robes so he is enabled to return home again. At this place in the story, Nibley comments, “If the whole rest of the poem is applied to the garment only, it is full of strange anomalies, which become perfectly clear in terms of the well-known Veil of the Temple.”{5}

The poem is not named in the Acts of Thomas, but is now called The Hymn of the Pearl. Its first translation was titled, The Hymn of the Soul Contained in the Syriac Acts of St. Thomas, Re-edited with an English translation by Anthony Ashley Bevan. {6}

Bevan’s translation remains the basic English text, but more recent translators differ in some parts. The following is Bevan’s translation interspersed with the work of other scholars. Those differences are important because they often amplify the meaning and broaden the scope and significance of the poem. {7}
——————————–

The Hymn of the Pearl by Anthony Ashley Bevan.

1 When I was a little child,
And dwelling in my kingdom in my Father’s house,
2 And in the wealth and the glories
Of my nurturers had my pleasure,

“In my first primeval childhood I was nurtured in the royal house of my Father with loving care in the midst of abundance and glory” (Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 267).

3 From the East, our home,
My parents, having equipped me, sent me forth.
4 And of the wealth of our treasury
They had already tied up for me a load,
5 Large it was, yet light,
So that I might bear it unaided-
6 Gold of . …
And silver of Gazzak the great,
7 And rubies of India,
And agates (?) from the land of Kushan (?),
8 And they girded me with adamant [diamond ]
Which can crush iron.
9 And they took off from me the bright robe,
Which in their love they had wrought for me,

9. They removed from me the garment of light,
which they had made for me in love”
(Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 268).

10 And my purple toga,
Which was measured (and) woven to my stature.
11 And they made a compact with me,
And wrote it in my heart that it should not
be forgotten:

11 And they made with me a covenant
And wrote it in my heart, that I might not forget”
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2: 499).
“Covenant” is also in: Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 268; James, Apocryphal New Testament, 411.

12 “If thou goest down into Egypt,
And bringest the one pearl,
13 Which is in the midst of the sea
Hard by the loud-breathing serpent,
[devouring serpent, ]
I4 (Then) shalt thou put on thy bright robe
And thy toga, which is laid over it,
15 And with thy Brother, our next in rank,
Thou shalt be heir in our kingdom.”
16 I quitted the East (and) went down,
There being with me two messengers,
17 For the way was dangerous and difficult,
And I was very young to tread it.
18 I passed the borders of Maishin,
The meeting-place of the merchants of the East,
19 And I reached the land of Babel.
And entered the walls of … [Sarbug ]
20 I went down into Egypt,
And my companions parted from me.
21 I betook me straight to the serpent,
Hard by his dwelling I abode,
21 (Waiting) till he should slumber and sleep,
And I could take my pearl from him.
23 And when I was single and alone,
A stranger to those with whom I dwelt,
24 One of my race, a free-born man,
From among the Easterns, I beheld there-
25 A youth fair and well favored ….
26 …. and he came and attached himself to me.
27 And I made him my intimate,
A comrade with whom I shared my merchandise.
28 I warned him against the Egyptians
And against consorting with the unclean;

23 And since I was all aloneI was a stranger to my companions of my hostelry.
24 But one of my race I saw there, A nobleman out of the East,
25 A youth fair and lovable,
26 An anointed one, And he came and attached himself to me
27 And I made him my intimate friend, My companion to whom I communicated my business.
28 I (He ?) warned him (me ?) against the Egyptians
And against consorting with the unclean (Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:499).

29 And I put on a garb like theirs,
Lest they should insult (?) me
because I had come from afar,

29 But I clothed myself in garments like theirs,
That they might not suspect that I was come from without”
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:499).

30 To take away the pearl,
And (lest) they should arouse the serpent against me,
31 But in some way or other
They perceived that I was not their countryman;
32 So they dealt with me treacherously,
Moreover they gave me their food to eat.
33 I forgot that I was a son of kings.
And I served their king;
34 And I forgot the pearl,
For which my parents had sent me,
35 And by reason of the burden of their… [food]
I lay in a deep sleep,
36 But all these things that befell me
My parents perceived and were grieved for me;
37 And a proclamation was made in our kingdom,
That all should speed to our gate,
38 Kings and princes of Parthia
And all the nobles of the East
39 So they wove a plan on my behalf,
That I might not be left in Egypt,

36. Meanwhile the heavenly parents, aware of what has happened,
37. call a family council
38. of all the great and noble relatives,
39. who decide it is time to act
(Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 269).

40 And they wrote to me a letter,
And every noble signed his name thereto:
41 “From thy Father, the King of kings,
And thy Mother, the mistress of the East,
42 And from thy Brother, our next in rank,
To thee our son, who art in Egypt, greeting!
43 Up and arise from thy sleep,
And listen to the words of our letter
44 Call to mind that thou art a son of kings!
See the slavery-whom thou servest!
45 Remember the pearl
For which thou didst speed to Egypt!
46 Think of thy bright robe,
And remember thy glorious toga,
47 Which thou shalt put on as thine adornment.
When thy name hath been read out
in the list of the valiant,
48 And with thy Brother, our. ..
Thou shalt be …in our kingdom.”

48 And thou with thy brother, our crown prince,
Be heir in our kingdom”
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:501).

45 Remember the pearl for the which thou wast sent into Egypt
46 Remember thy garment spangled with gold,
47 and the glorious mantle which thou shouldest wear
and wherewith thou shouldest deck thyself.
Thy name is named in the book of life,
48 and with thy brother whom thou hast received (thou shalt
be) in our kingdom (James, Apocryphal New Testament, 413).

49 And my letter (was) a letter
Which the King sealed with his right hand,
50 (To keep it) from the wicked ones,
the children of Babel,
And from the savage demons of … [Sarburg]
51 It flew in the likeness of an eagle,
The king of all birds;
51 It flew and alighted beside me,
And became all speech.
53 At its voice and the sound of its rustling,
I started and arose from my sleep.

53 At its voice and the sound of its rustling
I awoke and stood up from my sleep,
54 I took it and kissed it,
Broke its seal and read.
55 And even as it was engraven in my heart
Were the words of my letter written
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:501).

54 I took it up and kissed it,
And loosed its seal (?), (and) read;
55 And according to what was traced on my heart
Were the words of my letter written.
56 I remembered that I was a son of kings,
And my free soul longed for its natural state.

56 I remembered that I was a son of kings
And my noble birth asserted itself.
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:501).

54 He kisses the letter, breaks the seal, and reads,
55 Lo, it is the same letter as that which he brought
with him from on high written in his heart.
56 He remembers that he is a King son,
and his royal nature asserts itself
(Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 270).

57 I remembered the pearl,
For which I had been sent to Egypt,

56 I remembered that I was a son of kings,
And my freedom longed for its own nature.
57 I remembered the pearl,
For which I had been sent to Egypt
(Grant, Gnosticism, 119-20)

58 And I began to charm him,
The terrible loud-breathing serpent.
59 I hurried him to sleep and lulled him into slumber,
For my Father’s name I named over him,
60 And the name of our next in rank,
And of my Mother, the queen of the East;
61 And I snatched away the pearl,
And turned to go back to my Father’s house.
62 And their filthy and unclean garb
I stripped off, and left it in their country,

And I snatched the pearl,
and I turned to go to my father’s house.
I stripped off their dirty robe
and left it in their country
(Cartlidge and Dungan, Documents for the Study, 48).

63 And I took my way straight to come
To the light of our home, the East.

62 And I stripped off the filthy garment and left it in their 1and,
63 and directed my way forthwith to the light of my fatherland
in the East (James, Apocryphal New Testament, 413).

64 And my letter, my awakener,
I found before me on the road,
65 And as with its voice it had awakened me.
(So) too with its light it was leading me
66 … Shone before me with its form,
67 And with its voice and its guidance
It also encouraged me to speed,

66 For at times the royal garment of silk (shone) before mine eyes,
67 (and with its voice and its guidance it also encouraged me
to speed,) (James, Apocryphal New Testament, 414).

68 … And with his love was drawing me on.

65 And as with its voice it had awakened me
[So] too with its light it was leading me
66 For the royal garment of silk
Shone before me with its form,
67 And with its voice and its guidance
It also encouraged me to speed,
68 And with its love was drawing me on. (Grant, Gnosticism, 120).

69 I went forth, passed by …
I left Babel on my left hand,

68 And drawing me with its love.
69 I went forth, passed through Sarburg,
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:502).

70 And reached Maishin the great,
The haven of the merchants,
71 That sitteth on the shore of the sea …
72 And my bright robe, which I had stripped off,
And the toga wherein it was wrapped,

72 His garment of light and his outer robe were waiting for him here
(Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 270. Nibley adds, “Note that raiment is put on not only at the beginning of the journey and at the end, but is also donned at intermediate stages.”)

73 From the heights of Hyrcania (?)
My parents sent thither,
74 By the hand of their treasurers,
Who in their faithfulness could be trusted therewith.
75 And because I remembered not its fashion-
For in my childhood I had left it in my Father’s house
76 On a sudden, as I faced it,
The garment seemed to me like a mirror of myself.
77 I saw it all in my whole self,
Moreover I faced my whole self in (facing) it,
78 For we were two in distinction
And yet again one in one likeness.
79 And the treasurers also,
Who brought it to me, I saw in like manner,
80 That they were twain (yet) one likeness,
For one kingly sign was graven on them,

80 That they were two of a single form,
For one sign of the king was impressed upon them,
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:502).

81 Of his hand that restored to me (?)
My treasure and my wealth by means of them,
82 My bright embroidered robe,
Which …with glorious colours;

78 For we were two in distinction
And yet again one in one likeness.
79 And the treasurers also,
Who brought it to me, I saw in like manner,
80 That they were twain [yet] one likeness,
For there was graven on them one sign of the King,
81 Whose hands [they were] “which restored to me [?]
My treasure and my wealth by means of them,
82 My bright embroidered robe,
which was decorated with glorious colours;
(Grant, Gnosticism, 121).

83 With gold and with beryls,
And rubies and agates (?)
84 And sardonyxes varied in color,
It also was made ready in its home on high (?).
85 And with stones of adamant
All its seams were fastened;

85 “Fastened everywhere with diamond clasps.” (Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 271 . Nibley adds this note: “All its seams were sewn with diamonds” [Adam]. This indicates that the garment, though the same one, is now enhanced, gesteigert, the same garment, but a better one, enriched by earthly merits and victory [Hoffmann, p. 286]).”

86 And the image of the King of kings
Was depicted in full allover it,

86 And the likeness of the king of kings
Was completely embroidered all over it
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:503).
———–
86 And the image of the King of Kings covered the whole thing. (Nibley, Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri, 271. Nibley adds this note: “If the whole rest of the poem is applied to the garment only, it is full of strange anomalies, which become perfectly clear in terms of the well-known Veil of the Temple.”)

87 And like the sapphire-stone also
Were its manifold hues.
88 Again I saw that all over it
The motions of knowledge were stirring,
89 And as if to speak
I saw it also making itself ready.
90 I heard the sound of its tones,
Which it uttered to those who brought it down (?)
91 Saying, “I …
Whom they reared for him (?)
in the presence of my father,
92 And I also perceived in myself
That my stature was growing according to his labors.”

89 And as if to speak
I saw it also making itself ready.
90 I heard the sound of its tones,
Which it uttered to those who brought it down [?]
91 Saying,” I am he who is mighty in deeds
I whom they reared for him in the presence of my father,
92 And I also perceived in myself (Grant, Gnosticism,121).

93 And in its kingly motions
It was spreading itself out towards me,
94 And in the hands of its givers
It hastened that I might take it.

91 “I belong to the most valiant servant,
For whom they reared me before my father,
92 And I perceived also in myself
That my stature grew according to his labours.”
93 And with its royal movements
It poured itself entirely toward me,
94 And in the hands of its bringers
It hastened, that I might take it;
(Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2:503).

95 And me too, my love urged on
That I should run to meet it and receive it,
96 And I stretched forth and received it,
With the beauty of its colors I adorned myself.
97 And my toga of brilliant colors
I cast around me, in its whole breadth.
98 I clothed myself therewith, and ascended
To the gate of salutation and homage;
99 I bowed my head, and did homage
To the Majesty of my Father, who had sent it to me,
100 For I had done his commandments,
And he too had done what he promised,
101 And at the gate of his princes
I mingled with his nobles;
102 For he rejoiced in me and received me,
And I was with him in his kingdom.
103 And With the voice of …
All his servants glorify him.
104 And he promised that also to the gate
Of the King of kings I should speed with him,
105 And bringing my gift and my pearl
I should appear with him before our King.

91 I am of him that is more valiant than all men,
for whose sake I was reared up with the Father himself.
92 And I also perceived his stature
(Greek reads, “I perceived in myself that my stature
grew in accordance with his working).
93 And all Its royal motions rested upon me as it grew toward
the impulse of it (And with its kingly motions it was spreading itself toward me).
94 And it hastened, reaching out from the hand of (him that
brought it) unto him that would receive it,
95 and me also did yearning arouse to start forth and meet it
and receive it.
96 And I stretched forth and received it, and adorned myself with
the beauty of the colours thereof,
97 and in my royal robe excelling in beauty I arrayed myself wholly.
98 And when I had put it on, I was lifted up unto the place of
peace (salutation) and homage,
99 and I bowed my head and worshipped the brightness of the
Father which had sent it unto me,
100 for I had performed his commandments, and he likewise
that which he had promised,
101 and at the doors of his palace which was from the beginning
I mingled among (his nobles),
102 and he rejoiced over me and received me with him into his palace,
103 and all his servants do praise him with sweet voices.
104 And he promised me that with him I shall be sent unto the
gates of the king,
105 that with my gifts and my pearl we may appear together
before the king (James, Apocryphal New Testament, 414-15).
————————–

FOOTNOTES

{1} For the full story of its finding and translation see, Morton Smith, The Secret Gospel, The Discovery and Interpretation of the Secret Gospel According to Mark (Clearlake, CA, Dawn Horse Press, 1982), 14-17.

{2} Gospel of Thomas in James M. Robinson, ed., The Nag Hammadi Library in English (San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1988), 130, 37.

{3} Book of the Secrets of Enoch, chapter 22:8-9, in The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, 2 vols., Translated and edited by R. H. Charles. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1976), 2: 431-69.

{4} Hugh Nibley, Abraham in Egypt (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1981, 2000), 373; Nibley, Abraham in Egypt, in CWHN 14:373. See “Shechinah” in LDS Bible dictionary.
For a discussion of that garment of light and its significance, see Stephen Ricks, “The Garment of Adam in Jewish, Muslim, and Christian Tradition.” in Temples of the Ancient World, edited by Donald W. Parry. 705-39. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994.
For a discussion of the ancient Israelite temple drama see our Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord (the entire book).

{5}There is a careful discussion of the poem in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition, 103-21; second (paperback) edition 83-98. The paperback edition is available on this website.

{6}Anthony Ashley Bevan, trans, Hymn of the Soul Contained in the Syriac Acts of St Thomas, Re-edited with an English Translation (Cambridge, University Press, 1897).

{7} The other translators are:

David R. Cartlidge, and David L. Dungan, Documents for the Study of the Gospels (Philadelphia, Fortress, 1980).

Robert M. Grant, Gnosticism (New York, Harper and Brothers, 1966).

Edgar Hennecke, New Testament Apocrypha, 2 vols., edited by Wilhelm Schneemelcher. Translated by R. McL. Wilson (Philadelphia, Westminster, 1963). (see “Schneemelcher,” for the revised edition.)

Hugh Nibley, The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri: An Egyptian Endowment (Salt Lake City, Deseret Book, 1975).

Montague Rhodes James, The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, Clarendon, 1975).

<><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><>

Posted in John | Comments Off on John 11:43-44 & Hymn of the Pearl & others — LeGrand Baker)

John 10:10 — ‘I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly’ — LeGrand Baker

It is difficult to know whether the Savior is talking about an abundant life here or hereafter. But that is probably a moot question, because this life and the next are a continuum. The experience we call death appears to us to be a break in life’s continuity, but in terms of our eternal Self, this world and the next are a package deal.

9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
10 …. I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
….
14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.
15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
16 And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd.
17 Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again.
18 No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father (John 10:9-18).

The words that follow the Savior’s statement are about the power of his resurrection, so the context suggests that the “abundant life” he promises to the faithful is a quality of being that can only be experienced by those whom the scriptures call “the pure in heart” (3 Nephi 12:8; D&C 56:18, 97:15-21). We get to leave this body when it is no longer functional, but our spirits remain the same. Our memory of this world as well as our agency, personality, and integrity all remain intact. On the day we die, the person we have become, is the person we still are. Amulek’s famous words teach that principle very plainly.

32 For behold, this life is the time for men to prepare to meet God; yea, behold the day of this life is the day for men to perform their labors.
33 And now, as I said unto you before, as ye have had so many witnesses, therefore, I beseech of you that ye do not procrastinate the day of your repentance until the end; for after this day of life, which is given us to prepare for eternity, behold, if we do not improve our time while in this life, then cometh the night of darkness wherein there can be no labor performed.
34 Ye cannot say, when ye are brought to that awful crisis, that I will repent, that I will return to my God. Nay, ye cannot say this; for that same spirit which doth possess your bodies at the time that ye go out of this life, that same spirit will have power to possess your body in that eternal world. (Alma 34:32-34).

Modern revelation modifies Amulek’s teachings to show that people do have an opportunity to repent in the post-mortal spirit world. I believe he understood that, but his teaching the apostate Zoramites was neither the time nor the place to offer that as an option. {1}

It is often true that people in our time, like the Zoramites, worship a God that is patterned after themselves. When that is so, the God always hates the same people we hate and likes the people who are “on our side.” For example, when I was a boy I read (and history seemed to confirm) that “God is an Englishman.” A similar example is that during the first and second world wars, Christians on both sides prayed to the same God that he would destroy their enemies. Individually, we justify our prejudices by the belief that God shares those prejudices and condones our acts of bigotry. Unkind people worship a ridged and unkind God. People without standards feel justified by a God who also has none, just as Nephi said.

8 And there shall also be many which shall say: Eat, drink, and be merry; nevertheless, fear God—he will justify in committing a little sin; yea, lie a little, take the advantage of one because of his words, dig a pit for thy neighbor; there is no harm in this; and do all these things, for tomorrow we die; and if it so be that we are guilty, God will beat us with a few stripes, and at last we shall be saved in the kingdom of God (2 Nephi 28:8).

Those beliefs change nothing that is eternal. God, his love, his justice and mercy are all constants. Our rationalization does not change that. A morbid or greedy person cannot experience selfless joy or believe it is genuine when he sees it in other people. Similarly, a person whose life is dominated by evil, cannot tolerate righteousness in others.

But it is possible that we can tap into God’s reality to understand his nature, and when we do, our lives reflect what he is. Heber C. Kimball explained that very well.

I am perfectly satisfied that my God is a cheerful, pleasant, lively, and good-natured Being. Why? Because I am cheerful, pleasant, lively, and good-natured when I have His Spirit. That is one reason why I know; and another is the Lord said, through Joseph Smith, “I delight in a glad heart and a cheerful countenance.” That arises from the perfection of His attributes; He is a jovial, lively person, and a beautiful man. {2}

The kind of God we worship defines our character, and, as Hugh Nibley explained, our character defines our present and our future Self.

The essence of wickedness is meanness [selfishness]. There’s the passage from John Donne that John F. Kennedy used to like to quote: “A dog starved at his master’s gate portends the ruin of the state.” If a man lets his dog starve, he’s that kind of person. Or as Heraclitus would put it: “A man’s character is his fate.” You can tell what’s going to happen if you know who the man is and what kind of character he has. It’s going to lead to a tragic end or a happy end as the case may be. This is it; it’s the character. We read the passages. That’s the kind of people they were. That was what was wrong. It wasn’t the Babylonians or the Egyptians that worried them; it was the people themselves. As Solon said, “These people themselves have brought this ruin upon their state.” They are full of lust; they can never get enough. They rob each other and steal from the state like bandits, etc. It’s the same thing here in our world. It’s that kind of world. {3}

That says it all: “A man’s character is his fate.” The abundant life Jesus promised is a product of one’s character. The Prophet Joseph said essentially the same thing when he taught that we must be authorized to believe. {4} That authorization comes through adherence to validating covenants and ordinances, and living to qualify us to have Holy Ghost be our tutor and mentor. If we will permit it, the Savior’s Atonement will enable us to cleanse and purify our characters by the gift and power of the Holy Ghost. That qualifies us to know and live an abundant life, but only those who are faithful to their covenants are able to accept, appreciate, and be a part of that fellowship.

Moroni explained that a purpose of the Nephite church was to help its members achieve that end.

4 And after they had been received unto baptism, and were wrought upon and cleansed by the power of the Holy Ghost, they were numbered among the people of the church of Christ; and their names were taken, that they might be remembered and nourished by the good word of God, to keep them in the right way, to keep them continually watchful unto prayer, relying alone upon the merits of Christ, who was the author and the finisher of their faith (Moroni 6:3-4).

That cleansing authorizes us to believe and also authorizes us to know what to believe. The Prophet Joseph taught,

18 Whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the resurrection.
19 And if a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come (D&C 130:18-19).

I take it that the “principle of intelligence” means something very different from “street smarts” or even a college education. It has more to do with character and being qualified to know, to believe, and to do.

40 For intelligence cleaveth unto intelligence; wisdom receiveth wisdom; truth embraceth truth; virtue loveth virtue; light cleaveth unto light; mercy hath compassion on mercy and claimeth her own; justice continueth its course and claimeth its own; judgment goeth before the face of him who sitteth upon the throne and governeth and executeth all things (D&C 88:40).

In the most comprehensive sense, the principle of our intelligence is who/what we are. In this life, we live only in the moment. Our experiences in those moments are as fleeting as time. We can never re-live them again. If they were pleasant we can seek to recreate them in our memory or seek to replicate them in a different time, but once the moment is gone, it can never come back again. Past accomplishments and/or mistakes are who we were, but no longer who we are. The past events define and mold us, but only if we insist on pulling their ghost along with us into our present. The ghosts live only in our uncertain memories, but even our memory is a selective illusion. Notwithstanding the ghosts, we are no longer the person who once succeeded or failed. Rather, we are only the person we are just now.

Many ancient and modern philosophers believe that this whole life is an illusion. That belief is understandable because our past is as gone as a forgotten dream. And the future never will be.

When I was on my mission in England, the Archbishop of Canterbury published an Easter message that defined his belief in eternal life. He wrote that when we dream, the experience seems real even though there are no rules about time or place. He suggested that as we die and our body grows cold, we may dream a dream that seems to go on forever. He wrote that the advantage of living a good life would be to have a final pleasant dream as our minds fade into a blissful nothingness.

That is not the abundance of life the Savior promised, but neither is the abundance that our modern culture creates.

We can go to a movie, sit in the dark for a couple hours watching the product of someone else’s imagination, and can artificially stimulate virtually every emotion we can experience in the real world — love, hate; anxiety, security; fear, peace — all can be experienced there. Because those emotions are a counterfeit, we have a right to wonder what they really are. But there is one feeling that is outside those emotions and cannot be artificially created, not even within ourselves. That is the sure witness of the Holy Ghost that Jesus is the Christ. The quality of the pure joy that accompanies that assurance is different from any emotion we can self-generate. When one is acquainted with that joy, then one knows his soul has touched the purest form of eternal reality.

Only when we have nothing real to hang on to is life an illusion and the past an irretrievable dream. But when one knows with absolute certainty that Jesus is the Christ, then upon that rock one can build a superstructure of truth that will withstand the ages. I know that the Savior is real because his love defines my own reality. I love therefore I am. I love others and they reciprocate; therefore, I know they are real also.

Only those who have never experienced it will challenge the assertion that persons who know the gospel and live it fully have richer and more fulfilling lives than those who do not. The Savior’s metaphor is sheep grazing peacefully and securely under the watchful eye of their shepherd. It portends peace, security in one’s sense of Self, the assurance of belonging, and the ability to give and receive love. These are the qualities of an abundant life in this world and they surely are also the basic qualities of joy in the world to come.

An abundant life is a present and eternal fellowship with the Savior, our families and our friends. It is a forever intimate togetherness — a forever not-being-alone.
————————–

FOOTNOTES

{1} I think it is reasonable to assume he understood Isaiah 61, especially since the Savior referenced it in the Beatitudes.

{2} Journal of Discourses, February 8, 1857, 4:222.

{3} Hugh W. Nibley, Teachings of the Book of Mormon, Semester 1, Transcripts of lectures presented to an Honors Book of Mormon Classat Brigham Young University1988-1990, (Foundation for Ancient Research & Mormon Studies [F.A.R.M.S.], 1993), 74.

{4}George A. Smith, while serving in the First Presidency, reported: “Joseph Smith taught that every man and woman should seek the Lord for wisdom, that they might get knowledge from Him who is the fountain of knowledge; and the promises of the gospel, as revealed, were such as to authorize us to believe, that by taking this course we should gain the object of our pursuit.”

Teachings of Presidents of the Church: Joseph Smith, A Course of Study for the Melchizedek Priesthood Quorums of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, [Melchizedek Priesthood manual] (Salt Lake City: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 2007), 266.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in John, Uncategorized | Comments Off on John 10:10 — ‘I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly’ — LeGrand Baker

John 10:34-36 & Psalm 82 — ‘Ye are gods…children of the most High’ — LeGrand Baker

34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? (John 10:34-36)

Jesus was quoting Psalm 82 which was a scene in the ancient Israelite Feast of Tabernacles temple drama. It depicts Elohim standing among the members of the Council in Heaven and instructing them in what sounds very much like the law of consecration. Then, in the drama, he asks them to rise and accept those instructions by covenant. I suspect John had several reasons for calling our attention to that psalm by telling us about this incident in Jesus’s life,.

One reason might have been that the Jewish leaders (about 600 years earlier) had re-invented their theology in the same way the Christians would later re-define theirs. The Christians took the Father, Son, and Holly Ghost and merged into one intangible, undefinable God that they called Jesus. The apostate Jews during or soon after the Babylonian captivity did essentially the same thing. They took Elohim, Jehovah, and the Council in Heaven and merged them into one God which they called Jehovah. Because this temple psalm takes place in the Council where Elohim presided, it emphasizes the importance of the original Godhead whom the Jewish leaders had rejected. It also shows Heavenly Father’s relationship with the members of that Council.

Another reason was that it called attention to the law of consecration, and thereby to the responsibility the Jews and their leaders had to care for the poor. The book of Acts shows that principle became a major focus of early Christian belief and practice.

Another reason is that it shows the validity of the Savior’s claim to be the Son of God.

32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?
33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.
34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?
35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
36 Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?
37 If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not.
38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.
39 Therefore they sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand (John 10:32-39).

Psalm 82, which the Savior quoted, is a rather short, but very significant window into covenants we made in our premortal world. It reads,

1 God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.
2 How long will ye judge unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked?
3 Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy.
4 Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked.
5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course.
6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
7 But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes.
8 Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations (Psalms 82:1-8).

The first verse says, “God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods.” Both the words “God” and “gods” are translated from the Hebrew word elohim. Elohim is a plural word that means “the gods.” Elohim is also the name/title of the Father of the gods. So our psalm begins, “Elohim standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the elohim.”

In a court of law, a judge sits as an evidence of his superior status. In this psalm God is standing. That is important because in ancient Israel one stood to make a covenant. An example is 2 Kings 23:3. “The king stood by a pillar, and made a covenant before the Lord … And all the people stood to the covenant.”

Sometimes in the scriptures, to “stand” is simply code for making a covenant, just as it is here our psalm. The first verse tells us that the Father [Elohim] is standing. In the last verse he says “Arise, O God [also elohim].” That final elohim is also translated as God, but that does not make much sense in this context because God is already standing. That leaves the correct translation to be, “Arise, O elohim” — gods, the members of the heavenly Council. They are asked to stand to make a covenant. Between the first and last verses of Psalm 82 we read the Father’s instructions about one of the most important covenants we made in the premortal world and also one of the most important we re-make here.

The Book of Abraham provides us with a probable context where those covenants were made.

In Abraham 3 the “spirits” whom God will make his “rulers” are the same as the intelligences who were called the noble and great ones in the previous verse. In the next chapter, when they organize the earth, they are called “the gods.”

22 Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones;
23 And God saw these souls that they were good, and he stood in the midst of them, and he said: These I will make my rulers; for he stood among those that were spirits, and he saw that they were good; and he said unto me: Abraham, thou art one of them; thou wast chosen before thou wast born (Abraham 3:22-23).

1 And then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth (Abraham 4:1).

Psalm 82 and Abraham 3:22-23 appear to be two versions of the same story. In the psalm God is “judging,” in Abraham 3 he is choosing. To “judge” means the same thing in Hebrew as it does in English. When pronouncing judgment, a judge may condemn or exonerate, or in other situations he chooses and makes assignments (such as assigning ribbons in an apple pie contest). In this psalm he is not sitting as one a judge presiding at a court of law. Rather he is standing, as one would do when making a covenant. Thus, it might be more precise to say, “God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he chooses [makes assignments] among the gods.”

In Psalm 82, the gods among whom Elohim was standing were the members of the Council in Heaven. “God saw these souls that they were good, and he stood in the midst of them, and he said: These I will make my rulers.” Significantly, “he stood in the midst of them,” so they were standing around him, probably in a circle, where he made them priests and kings.

The original scene depicted by Psalm 82 can more readily be understood by inserting it into the account recorded in Abraham 3, where it fits so perfectly that it does not even break the cadence of the story. Please note, by putting the two scriptures together in this way, I do not wish to imply that they were ever written as a single unit. However, combined this way they illustrate an interesting—perhaps insightful—picture of how things might have been in the Council in Heaven, and also how they might have been portrayed on the stage during the Israelite temple drama.

Now the Lord had shown unto me, Abraham, the intelligences that were organized before the world was; and among all these there were many of the noble and great ones; And God saw these souls that they were good, and he stood in the midst of them. God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods. [He asked,] How long will ye judge [rule] unjustly, and accept the persons of the wicked?{1} Defend the poor and fatherless: do justice to the afflicted and needy. Deliver the poor and needy: rid them out of the hand of the wicked. They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course. I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes. Arise, O gods, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations. [After the covenant, God said,] These I will make my rulers; for he stood among those that were spirits, and he saw that they were good; and he said unto me: Abraham, thou art one of them; thou wast chosen before thou wast born (Abraham 3:22-23 & Psalm 82).

The idea that the law of consecration was among the first and most important covenants made by the members of the Council in Heaven, is perfectly consistent with other scriptures. In the Book of Mormon the celestial height to which we reach is charity. In the Doctrine and Covenants it is the law of consecration. They are two sides of the same coin when charity is what one is, the law of consecration is what one does. They are the two great commandments.

36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets (Matthew 22:36-40, see D&C 59:6).

Charity is love. There is no point in trying to separate loving God from loving his children. They are the same. The human soul cannot love God and harbor hatred or prejudice at the same time. John the Beloved taught that we cannot feign to compartmentalize our bigotry from our charity and pretend both are real.

18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
19 We love him, because he first loved us.
20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?
21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also (1 John 4:18-21).

To love God is Charity (hesed — unfailing love based on a prior covenant); to love one’s brother is also charity (hesed). To live the law of consecration is to serve others — “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me (Matthew 25:40).”

It is probably true that the Father’s first instructions to his children at the Council was that when they come to this earth they must obey what James called the “royal law.” James describes that law the same way it is described in Psalm 82.

8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors (James 2:8-9).

Some of the above is taken from two chapters in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord: “Psalm 82, The Father’s Instructions to the Council,” and “Psalm 82: Instruction and Covenant,” first edition, 227-45; second edition (paperback), 162-74. The second edition is still in print and it is also available on this website in the section called “published books.”

————————–
FOOTNOTES

{1}Lowell K. Handy’s translation is: “How long will you rule unjustly? And honor the wicked?” (“Sounds, Words and Meanings in Psalm 82,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 47 [1990]: 51-66.).
The Tanakh, which is the official Jewish translation of the Old Testament, renders verse 2 as “How long will you judge perversely, showing favor to the wicked?” (Tanakh, The Holy Scriptures: The New JPS Translation According to the Traditional Hebrew Text [Philadelphia and Jerusalem: The Jewish Publication Society, 1985]), 1206.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in John, Psalms | Comments Off on John 10:34-36 & Psalm 82 — ‘Ye are gods…children of the most High’ — LeGrand Baker

John 10:1-42 — The Father and The Son — LeGrand Baker and Benjamin Tingey

Tucked away in the parable of the Good Shepherd is a great deal of information about Jehovah/Jesus’s relationship with his Eternal Father, and also about our relationship with both of them. Within the parable, Jesus says:

10 I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
………………..
15 As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep.
……………………..
27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father’s hand.
30 I and my Father are one (John 10:1-42 ).

My old Strong’s definition for “one” in verse 30 reads “a prime number: one” (# 1520). However, the word is also translated as “first” in the phrase “the first day of the week” in Luke 24:1, John 20:1, and Acts 19:34. In the sentence, “I and my Father are one,” the “one” asks all sorts of questions. However, “first” would supply all sorts of answers. It would say the same thing that the Prophet Joseph dictated to his scribe when he and Sidney Rigdon saw the vision that is Section 76.

12 By the power of the Spirit our eyes were opened and our understandings were enlightened, so as to see and understand the things of God—
13 Even those things which were from the beginning before the world was, which were ordained of the Father, through his Only Begotten Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, even from the beginning;
14 Of whom we bear record; and the record which we bear is the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ, who is the Son, whom we saw and with whom we conversed in the heavenly vision (D&C 76:12-14).

That concept, that Christ was with the Father from the beginning, is what Heavenly Father explained to Moses. It is interesting to me that the Father applies the name/title Only Begotten to the Savior so very early on in the description of their relationship.

1 And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto Moses, saying: Behold, I reveal unto you concerning this heaven, and this earth; write the words which I speak. I am the Beginning and the End, the Almighty God; by mine Only Begotten I created these things; yea, in the beginning I created the heaven, and the earth upon which thou standest.
……………………..
26 And I, God, said unto mine Only Begotten, which was with me from the beginning: Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and it was so. And I, God, said: Let them have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth ( Moses 2:1, 26).

We find more about the Father’s relationship with the Savior, and his with us, in the Great Intercessory Prayer.

5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word.
……………
9 I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine.
10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.
11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.
……………
21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
23 I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me.
24 Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world (John 17:5-24). {1}

Paul explains those relationships as our ultimate adoption to be children of the Father. “Ultimate” is the key word here, because we are initially adopted unto Christ when we embrace the Gospel and are baptized, taking upon us the name of Christ through the covenants and ordinances, becoming His Sons and His daughters, as he explained to the brother of Jared.

13 And when he had said these words, behold, the Lord showed himself unto him, and said: Because thou knowest these things ye are redeemed from the fall; therefore ye are brought back into my presence; therefore I show myself unto you.
14 Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the Father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters (Ether 3:13-14).

But the ultimate reunion occurs when we enter the presence of our Father with Christ are adopted as children of the Father. Paul described that sequence, and it has been elaborated on by other prophets. Paul wrote,

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
5 Having predestinated [foreordained] us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself [Heavenly Father], according to the good pleasure of his will,
6 To the praise of the glory of his [Heavenly Father’s]grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved [Christ](Ephesians 1:3-6).

As I understand it, the need for that adoption is this: We were Heavenly Father’s children before we came here. But we, like the prodical son, forfeited our birthright when we left home and came to this sin-bound world. Now, through the Atonement of the Savior, and by accepting correct covenants and ordinances, we are adopted back into the family with full rights of birthright as though we had never left. It is like Psalm 2 where the king is anointed king and adopted as a child and heir of Jehovah. Symbolically, all the men in the congregation are also anointed and adopted so they may claim their birthright blessings as priests and kings. {2}

Our premortal relationship with the Father and Jehovah are clearly shown in Lehi’s sode experience (1 Nephi 1:8-15). There we see the Father siting upon his throne, presiding. Jehovah conducts the meeting and gives Lehi his assignment. Other prophets who describe their sode experiences also report that it was “the LORD” (Jehovah) who made the assignments. Similarly, in the First Vision, the Father introduced his Son, and the Savior gave Joseph his assignment. When the Savior came to the Nephites in 3 Nephi we see that same pattern.

Apparently the Savior’s role as Advocate extends far beyond our accepting the initial blessings of the Atonement. The Savior explained, “unto as many as received me gave I power … to become the sons of God; and … power to obtain eternal life.” His full statement reads:

3 Listen to him who is the advocate with the Father, who is pleading your cause before him—
4 Saying: Father, behold the sufferings and death of him who did no sin, in whom thou wast well pleased; behold th e blood of thy Son which was shed, the blood of him whom thou gavest that thyself might be glorified;
5 Wherefore, Father, spare these my brethren that believe on my name, that they may come unto me and have everlasting life.
6 Hearken, O ye people of my church, and ye elders listen together, and hear my voice while it is called today, and harden not your hearts;
7 For verily I say unto you that I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the light and the life of the world—a light that shineth in darkness and the darkness comprehendeth it not.
8 I came unto mine own, and mine own received me not; but unto as many as received me gave I power to do many miracles, and to become the sons of God; and even unto them that believed on my name gave I power to obtain eternal life (D&C 45:3-8).

John describes that very succinctly where he writes,

12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name (John 1:12).

“Name” is often code for covenant because one always receives a new name when he makes a new covenant. So it would probably not change the meaning if it read, “even to them that believe on his covenant.”

The covenant is between us and the Father. For his part, the Savior is the terms, the validation and the fulfillment of that covenant. Moroni explained our part of the covenant in the last verses of the Book of Mormon.

32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness, and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.
33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot (Moroni 10:32-33).

The fellowships created by these covenants and validated by the ordinances are eternal. Through the Savior’s Atonement we may be adopted again as children and heirs of our Heavenly Father, but even then, our relationship with Savior never changes.

When this earthly experience is completed for all of us, the Savior will be triumphant.

107 When he shall deliver up the kingdom, and present it unto the Father, spotless, saying: I have overcome and have trodden the wine–press alone, even the wine–press of the fierceness of the wrath of Almighty God.
108 Then shall he be crowned with the crown of his glory, to sit on the throne of his power to reign forever and ever (D&C 76:106-07).

When he delivers his kingdom to his father, the Savior will be crowned with glory and sit upon his own throne as the Only Begotten of the Father. However the promise is that there will be a place for the righteous there as well. With very similar words both John and Mormon promised we would be with them.

1 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
3 And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure (1 John 3:1-3).

48 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, pray unto the Father with all the energy of heart, that ye may be filled with this love, which he hath bestowed upon all who are true followers of his Son, Jesus Christ; that ye may become the sons of God; that when he shall appear we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is; that we may have this hope; that we may be purified even as he is pure. Amen (Moroni 7:48).

For the just, the promise is, “all things are theirs … all are theirs and they are Christ’s, and Christ is God‘s.”

50 And again we bear record—for we saw and heard, and this is the testimony of the gospel of Christ concerning them who shall come forth in the resurrection of the just—
51 They are they who received the testimony of Jesus, and believed on his name and were baptized after the manner of his burial, being buried in the water in his name, and this according to the commandment which he has given—
52 That by keeping the commandments they might be washed and cleansed from all their sins, and receive the Holy Spirit by the laying on of the hands of him who is ordained and sealed unto this power;
53 And who overcome by faith, and are sealed by the Holy Spirit of promise, which the Father sheds forth upon all those who are just and true.
54 They are they who are the church of the Firstborn.
55 They are they into whose hands the Father has given all things—
56 They are they who are priests and kings, who have received of his fulness, and of his glory;
57 And are priests of the Most High, after the order of Melchizedek, which was after the order of Enoch, which was after the order of the Only Begotten Son.
58 Wherefore, as it is written, they are gods, even the sons of God—
59 Wherefore, all things are theirs, whether life or death, or things present, or things to come, all are theirs and they are Christ’s, and Christ is God’s.
60 And they shall overcome all things.
61 Wherefore, let no man glory in man, but rather let him glory in God, who shall subdue all enemies under his feet.
62 These shall dwell in the presence of God and his Christ forever and ever (D&C 76:50-62).

From eternity to eternity our relationships with the Savior and his Father has and will always be the same.
——————-

FOOTNOTES

{1} The word “one” in verses 11, 21, and 22 are also Strong’s # 1520. It would read differently, but interestingly, if “first” were to go in some of those places.

2} For an explanation of Psalm 2 see “Psalm 2, The Ancient Israelite Royal King-name,” in Who Shall Ascend into the Hill of the Lord, first edition 499-517; second (paperback) edition, 360-373.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Posted in John | Comments Off on John 10:1-42 — The Father and The Son — LeGrand Baker and Benjamin Tingey